If they actually had $270 million in revenues, why would they have 1 million in debt and need 2 million more "to continue".
The article did not seem long on background research, or other facts. However, i suspect many can relate to concerns about the opaqueness of the activities in SA, and the channeling away instead of reinvestment in Silver Falcon Mining. I hope this may change. We were told the Gaming investment was to improve value to shareholders, but so far any benefit is not visible. Any reassuring communications to shareholders in Silver Falcon regarding the diversion of the officers' energy, attention, activity and funds outside of Silver Falcon, have not been provided. That is not to say there has not been productive activity. Only to say some accountability to shareholders in SFMI and any basis on which shareholders may be reassured in the coming months has not been effectively communicated.
