InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1297
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/21/2008

Re: DeaconY post# 35053

Thursday, 09/04/2014 7:05:38 AM

Thursday, September 04, 2014 7:05:38 AM

Post# of 35619
so let me get this straight you spoke with an SGM who has a higher level of ocular distractor experience than a beat cop correct? And going by the tone of the message he was the decision making individual when it came to contract time correct? This is all well and good DeaconY, but for an individual who is seeking information there are a lot of questions left unanswered. Yes the Dazer was not selected,,but why? You mentioned this group of individuals already have been using other makes of ocular distractors, so from my point of view a contractor has already made a solid relationship thus has a much better advantage over a company that is new to the ocular distractor industry, and is unfamiliar to this group. In my opinion this is the real story behind why LEI is unsuccessful. Its not so much the Dazer, but a very small company with no clout. Not many people are willing to take a risk when they are already comfortable with the relationship they have established. I think most people would agree that once a contractor has established a good relationship I don't care if the device under test is far superior its not going to be selected. I have seen it time and again especially in a government funded environment. The problem does not reside with an SGM it goes way up the ladder to the individual who has signing privileges.