InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 1393
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/18/2013

Re: nyt post# 20267

Saturday, 08/30/2014 1:58:22 AM

Saturday, August 30, 2014 1:58:22 AM

Post# of 130882
You seem to keep implying (or saying outright) that "big dogs" have NOT made a play for these patents. How do you KNOW this? Just because they aren't sold yet? Not sure that's a valid conclusion after the patents have only become a complete portfolio within the last 5-6 months. And if the big dogs did make a play for them, I'm doubting they offered what VP is requiring be a minimum buyout price. Big Dogs would want it as a deal and therefore I am sure there had to be a significant amount of negotiating to prove to the big dogs that the patent's are definitely worth their asking price. All that takes time, time in which we are not privy to inside information. It's not as easy as "Oh gee, we really need these. We'd better offer them whatever they are asking so that we can get them first, asap!" They don't get to Big Dog status by making poor, rash, decisions.

I'm sure it took time to prove to people the earth was round. Changing perspectives does not always come easily. That's where patience and perseverance comes in. I believe in the BOD and I believe in the value of these patents.

If you KNOW something otherwise, please share it with the board, but please make sure you provide your proof as well. It would be much appreciated.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News