"NYT said it had never been tested or proven."
Excuse me but where did I say that?
Let me save you the trouble of trying to find such a quote. I did not say that... however I admit that if you read between the lines, I guess you could think I implied it, because I said things to the effect of..... if the patents were proven tech, then how could it have gone this long w/o some big dogs making a big play for it?
So I did not flatly say anything was or was not true or proven. What I did do.... is put out there for consideration & scrutiny, the simple & apparent fact, that SOMETHING doesn't make sense, doesn't add up...because the potential value is likely 10's - 100's of billions of dollars, or more, and IF there TRULY was proof of it, this sucker would be gone by now, one way or the other, plan A or B or otherwise, PERIOD!
I issued challenges to show any history of such a similar scenario to have occurred before. No acknowledgement. No takers...
Also I challenge to show any independent proof or any outside experts to have stepped up & said that they have independent, irrefutable & indisputable proof, that vp patents rule the very existence & usage of voip. I'm not so sure that USPTO is proof of anything. They issue patents if certain criteria is met. Do they state that they have tested & proven it as genuine & guaranteed to be the foundation of voip, in that voip cannot survive w/o it? That's what I'm talkin bout...
And if anyone believes this stuff kicked around, that it was tested/proven some 8 yrs ago & that that facts in turn, equates to it having not garnered any respect whatsoever, beyond ppl on this board & "maybe" BOD members, anywhere else.....then that to me, defines naivete'. Just saying..
