InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 144
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: Whalatane post# 33057

Thursday, 08/28/2014 8:57:26 AM

Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:57:26 AM

Post# of 427821
Hi Kiwi,

The AMRN vs AZN / Omthera case is about 662 patent.
The 662 patent: which requires that treatment with claimed formulation not increase LDL-C by more than 20%

AZN's noninfringement argument is that Epanova had an LDL-C increase of greater than 21%(2g) and 26%(4g) relative to baseline within Epanova arm.

However the patent is "against a baseline or a placebo arm".

Epanova had an LDL-C increase of 13%(2g) and 15%(4g) relative to placebo arm within Epanova study.

The case / claim not related to Marine, to Anchor or to statin.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News