Impact Fusion International Inc (IFUS)

[Darth Trader]

My comments are in (parens)

MW put OUR TOTAL COMPANY at RISK!!! (I quite agree. He hire JS, trusted him and at the time, never thought he'd have to look over his shoulder and watch his back. Do you deny this? You make MW out to be the culprit, but there's a reality check. JS had a function, had been hired to HELP MW! So he brought SA into the game THEN collaborated WITH SA to either take over or destroy the company! This was a set up from the beginning and it's still going on! Answer theses questions: 1) what was JS function? 2) what did JS do to get booted? 3) show me one bit of proof JS or SA is concerned about the shareholders)

> IFUS GUARANTEED THE $250,000 LOAN from the boot brothers - can you imagine SHAREHOLDERS NOT KNOWING THIS MATERIAL ITEM???
> (there's more to this than what your telling, it's not this simple. The shareholders know what MW did with the money it's all accounted for! You mentioned "boot brothers." Show me proof JS lent the company anything.)
> WHAT ELSE ARE MW and RW HIDING for personal gain and EGO??? - "PLENTY" as they lie, slander and "take no prisoners" that object to them. (Show me one lie MW or RW told or posted. Where's the proof they did anything for personal gain with IFUS. Show me the slander.)

> MW and RW do NOT care about shareholders and if ALL GOES BAD FOR IFUS - "your absolutely correct" - MW and RW will go on to their next victims (consistent with their 15 year track records) and OUR SHAREHOLDERS will get wiped out (as our shareholders do not DESERVE) (everything I've known about MW from credible sources, he's legit! I don't know RW so can't say. But I personally have a mutual acquaintance of JS. I've known the guy a long time and I trust what he says about JS to be accurate. JS is a woman beating backstabbing con artist. Period!)

> MUCH has been HIDDEN FROM SHAREHOLDERS by MW and RW - AND JUST MAYBE, "fraud") - NOT the purpose of investing!!! Do YOU THINK??? (I quite agree, but not for long. SA and JS will both face a new round of legal battles with the shareholders.)

(Is like some explanation. I've responded to your posts...)