InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 358
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/23/2013

Re: righton21 post# 30673

Sunday, 07/27/2014 10:02:38 AM

Sunday, July 27, 2014 10:02:38 AM

Post# of 82650
Quote: " the boot brother with money appears to have taken interest in this case, and now has 2 legal firms representing him"

What a strange statement made by ATJ. Over the past few months it is abundantly clear that one of the boot brothers must be the lender for who else would have an interest to sue?

We are also led to believe that ole joe can barely buy a cup of coffee so he would not be able to take an interest in the case monetarily. So by reason of deduction, the lender is a BB. And we know who the BB's are?

Is it possible that one law firm is do inept they needed back up?

ATJ posted last month that according to "their" attendee at the PV trial we appear to gave an excellent lawyer representing IFUS. That should make all shareholders happy and confident. Go IFUS.