![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Sunday, July 27, 2014 10:02:38 AM
What a strange statement made by ATJ. Over the past few months it is abundantly clear that one of the boot brothers must be the lender for who else would have an interest to sue?
We are also led to believe that ole joe can barely buy a cup of coffee so he would not be able to take an interest in the case monetarily. So by reason of deduction, the lender is a BB. And we know who the BB's are?
Is it possible that one law firm is do inept they needed back up?
ATJ posted last month that according to "their" attendee at the PV trial we appear to gave an excellent lawyer representing IFUS. That should make all shareholders happy and confident. Go IFUS.
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM