InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 148
Posts 11143
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2005

Re: KentS post# 402323

Thursday, 07/24/2014 8:50:33 AM

Thursday, July 24, 2014 8:50:33 AM

Post# of 730579
Even so Schedule 3.1a is a non-exclusive list. Section 3.1 of the P&A says the purchased entities "includes [sic*], but is not limited to, the entities listed on Schedule 3.1a."

(*It should read "include").

What I am still trying to work out is why the definition of "Assets" excludes "Assets owned by Subsidiares of the Failed Bank".

How does one interpret Section's 3.1's statement that the subs were in fact purchased if the assets of the subs are not included? What good is a sub without its assets?

The P&A is a very poorly written document. I would have thought that the FDIC would have had a finally worded document as a "go to" template, since the transferring of failed banks is part of their core business.


Any legal analysis I post may not be relied upon by anyone for any
purpose. If you want legal advice you can rely on, hire a lawyer.
Federal District Courthouse, Newark

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News