InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 541
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/24/2014

Re: Watts Watt post# 55246

Friday, 06/27/2014 2:10:08 PM

Friday, June 27, 2014 2:10:08 PM

Post# of 232787
Watts, first off my suggestion to split the board in two was sarcasm. While no one can deny your incredible knowledge of LQMT (you could write the definitive history of LQMT) calling what you do "healthy" is a stretch at best. You're 99 posts away from 5,000 on this board, and over the last 9 months (my involvement in LQMT) a large %age of those have been bitter, backward looking opinions. We all understand management is important, and a company’s track record is important. Wonder if it would hurt to put some of that knowledge into explaining why Apple would be investing huge sums of $ in LQMT, why Hauck came on board, the patents, etc. No one is asking for you to blow smoke and rah rah LQMT, but it might be healthy to have a little hope.

Secondly, I've been in and out of LQMT, got back in when the Visser issue was settled. I welcome and appreciate both sides of the argument. Two things I don't appreciate, those that hype the stock for no apparent reason and those that live in the past. The company is evolving; sure mgmt is the same, but companies like Apple, Materion etc., aren't intimately involved here for their health. Sorry things aren’t going to plan for you here. And truth be told, I would block your posts, if it wasn’t for the fact that if and when good news hits, you’re one of the few here knowledgeable enough that could potentially put some additional pieces of information together. That is, of course, if you’re not too consumed with your pessimism at that moment in time.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News