CirTran Corporation (CIRX)

[Pure_Greatness]

Thanks I really like this part.

Macy’s said it was “delighted” by the ruling and looks forward to the damages phase of the trial,which Oing has referred to a court referee.
Penney said it was “disappointed” and is weighing an appeal.

Do you think Macy's would be "delighted" if it was going to be "chump" change?? Pls post the damages once they announce them. Will be a good reference for CIRC.

nascow post:
Longs take notes: Instead of using th worthless comparison of litigation involving a "water district" to th CIRC case lets look at something with more recent precedent &similarity of history


The sneaky deal that JCPenney cut with Martha Stewart behind Macy’s back was such a disaster that the sheer public embarrassment of it is punishment enough.
That’s what a New York judge effectively said in a long-awaited decision Monday, ruling that while Penney improperly interfered with an exclusive Macy’s-Martha Stewart contract, its liability for court damages was limited.
http://nypost.com/2014/06/16/jcpenneys-behavior-childish-sophomoric-in-martha-deal/



Quote:
Let's all face it, you do not know what the award will be. In fact, the actual award is likely far from what you portray.... A number of things pointing to a major award: 1) Judge hasn't wavered on who she backs and it is 8-0. 2) Judge has given every opportunity to the defendants to work out a deal-- this means she is giving them an opportunity to control their damages. 3) Obviously the Judge has no love for Playboy in any of the decisions.4) This same Judge awarded a developer $36.4M because the Chicago water district simply blocked access to an alleyway and delayed development for three years. Story here:

www.chicagobusiness.com/realestate/20130116/CRED03/130119838?template=printart

So, how do you think she will award against a large pornography company who blocked business, forced financial damages and created legal issues for a beverage company, essentially stunting and damaging their business? $36.4M for blocking an alleyway and delaying construction without harming the rest of their business, versus years of damage to a business?

It is clear to me that the damages will be far more than the award I mentioned. If anyone does some homework, instead of listening to, or spewing random, simple opinionated thoughts, it would be far.


End Advice …Invest in a Corporate Attorney ...I'll bet Macy's shareholders thought they were entitled to huge damages too