Your point is a good one, that the damage done over decades can not easily be reversed in a short time.
However, my point was something else entirely. I was not expecting the damage to be reversed quickly. I was watching sales, particularly under a new CEO and new sales mgr & team--not much to report so far.
I know there is a lot of dredging and parsing of various financial factors, but the key one, IMO, is sales--and that is precisely what is missing from the Wave story under Solms.
So, one looks to pinpoint the reasons. Wave has had fabulous partners over the years--none bigger in their day--IBM, HWP, Intel, Atmel, Hauppauge Digital, Diebold and many others--so it is not a case of the big boys not knowing what Wave was pitching.
Solms, the former military leader, knew coming in sales was where he would have to make his mark.
I don't think we need to wait much longer to figure out why any number of sales people, past and present have tried and failed to sell Wave resulting in revenues, save less than a handful of companies.
It has to be the product. The early reviews were harsh. I asked some of the Wavoid faithful to show me one positive review of Wave's wares--I got back one link to an obscure website requiring joining and paying money to read the review which allegedly praised Wave.
Solms may be in the midst of re-engineering and improving the product--but generally speaking, that is not a quick thing for a small company to execute.
I believe the problem is Wave's product, period.
Blue
