InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 2931
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/27/2009

Re: sonic22 post# 387524

Wednesday, 06/18/2014 1:57:08 PM

Wednesday, June 18, 2014 1:57:08 PM

Post# of 432708
I'm not sure whether you are correct or not, but that's the way I understood it too.

Hey guys,
Apologize for this but I just got confused on the 8-K. So the 866 and 947 patents the ALJ still found no infringement. So he did not take the CAFC ruling in this from the 613 case but took the 800 claim construction for these 2 patents? I thought he was going to construe them based on the CAFC ruling and the Markham hearing which is the way IDCC wanted them to be. Am I incorrect in this thinking?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News