InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 277
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2008

Re: sonic22 post# 387111

Saturday, 06/14/2014 10:25:01 AM

Saturday, June 14, 2014 10:25:01 AM

Post# of 433036
It suddenly dawned on me, the ITC will twist itself in an unlimited Prezel to not rule in favor of IDCC.
As punishment the ITC can only give a domestic market exclusion and in a 'Standard' driven product such a ban would have to apply to all unlicensed particants. The political repercussions would just be too great. In Federal Court cases each offender must be named specifically.
Therefore, the ITC will always find a way to rule against one like IDCC and is willing to punt it 'upstairs'and let 'them' make the call.
For IDCC the ITC is and will be a dry hole. We should realize this now. Driving the current cases to their conclusion (whatever the results will be)is the only solution and money still well spent, but new cases should be initiated in more than one court system. Each case should be against one offender and each case should have a slightly different pool of patents. This way consolidation of cases could be opposed.
p.s. I'm a financial guy, not a lawyer
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News