You don't like psyops. Ok. Ill call it like it is BS. And you are full of it. You were yelling and screaming about patentability and you are wrong so now you hide behind rhetoric.
"If Kroplin had no claim of intellectual property in the States, why was Sanswire paying millions to license something that didn't exist? " It was a package deal which included the unit. Wsgi can pursue the argus anywhere kroplin does not have his rights already establish (just Germany)
"Regardless, the situation is a far cry from Indy's claim that WSGI holds a patent on the ARGUS design for the next 15-20 years. " now you are back tracking and deflecting. In addition, when did he ever say that? Again I call BS
"WSGI has never had a patent granted and owns no actual intellectual property. " you may be right about the patent. It is still pending. But you are showing how horrible your legal skills are. Just because you have a pacer account does not make you special, nor an actual attorney. But you mascarade here as one. You do know there is more to ip that just patents right? Just like you know the difference between the uspto and the patent cooperation treaty. Maybe you do know the difference and you are intentionally trying to mislead everyone on the board. Again, I call BS.
How did your SEC predictions work out? Good call on that one. Sheesh.
Edit: it must have been so satisfying for you to testify against all the bad guys at the sec trial!
