If your goal is to see the forest for the trees, and establish a clear policy as you so state, "If a poster were to continually post comments about the company or management that were nothing more than a smear campaign they would be deleted."
then IMO, Cassandra's posts would be the best example of a smear campaign with either repetitive or consistently hypothetically negative assertions.
Painting oneself into a corner is easier than it looks. How does one address the needs of committed shareholders if the forest is invisible?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.