My friend GI with all due respect:
We have known each other privately for some time and both of us are in almost constant contact with the decision makers at PTQ. Our goal is the same, to improve our company. We disagree completely on the best method to do so. Those questions I posed cannot be left to be only your problem. They were drawn by a very professional young man in our family law firm, and genuinely need to be explored and discussed, so that all might better understand and evaluate where you plan may lead. They are everyone's problem who might chose your path; questions that each might have before making a prudent decision. As I said, I post them without regard as to merit or evaluation of prospective outcome, but rather asking for information that would allow vetting of individuals, specifics on financing, and a path to evaluate the proper research with the required law firms, particularly as existing agreements, Panamanian Laws, and existing commitments would impact the firm.
We both have similar knowledge and information that is privileged and very similar in nature. Those things of course are private individually and between us. However, now that this new information has been made public revealing what has been achieved to date, and knowledge that production will soon be resumed at a profitable level, fully funded with no dilution or debt, it might be a reasonable time to reevaluate your plan from a practical mechanical standpoint, without regard to personal feelings toward anyone, and see which way will put a positive EPS on the bottom line quickly and efficiently. As is well known it is what is put on that bottom line that will actually directly affect the retail share price.
AI
