InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 2463
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/23/2002

Re: None

Sunday, 05/25/2014 10:52:54 PM

Sunday, May 25, 2014 10:52:54 PM

Post# of 621
The follow-up consideration:

How would Case 1 and Case 2 work out for VORTEX AIMing ?


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102450242

Considering that the Vortex Trading Functions are

Vortex Buy Advice = (PC-V)*/(1-Fb)
Vortex Sell Advice = (PC-V)*/(1-Fs)


you can see at a glance that the Vortex Method is a Ratio Trading System

and the Buying and the Selling have the general mathematical form of

Buying: . . . y=Ab*x
Selling:. . . y=As*x

Considering that for Case 1 the PC is being Updated by each Buy" and for Case 2 it is not, then you need to consider that in Vortex AIM the Ratio System retains the same Trading Ratio based on an equity price change, so that raising the PC to the new equity value V(new) after a trade, in Case 1, does not change the trading Rates, which are defined by the Constants Ab and As.
After each trade the PC(new)= V(new).

For this reason the accumulation of Step-wise Buys in Case 1 results in the same Total Buy Amount for a single large Buy in Case 2, as long as the price changes remain identical for both cases

For Vortex Case 1 and Case 2 of my Ocroft Method Options are Identical.

Conrad Winkelman
What is Vortex AIMing? Look for my Vortex Discussion Forum:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1341

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.