XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[JJSeabrook]

They could do a number of things, probably more than I could ever think of in my feeble mind. I think that they in some way have to address the jury calculation as to past GOOG damages. I don't know how they'll do that, but I sure as hell don't see any kind of reduction coming. LOL

The 6.5% isn't a part of the current appeal. That will be reached in the upcoming one. Yes, it is within their power to reduce it. Conversely, I think VRNG sought 7%, and it would also be within their power to increase the percentage, although I sure would NOT count on that happening. LOL




Stoppatentthieves Friday, 05/23/14 01:28:57 PM
Re: JJSeabrook post# 52945
Post # of 52949
JJS, thanks I agree with everything you say on Petrella.
If CAFC is going to remand with instructions for 5 years more of past damages that also means they have to decide on 20.9 % x 3.5 % as the basis for those damages, no?
That would also pretty much decide the main part of the next appeal for future damages as well, although they could reduce the 6.5 % to a lower number.
Please correct me if I am wrong