InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 145
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/26/2013

Re: JJSeabrook post# 52945

Friday, 05/23/2014 1:28:57 PM

Friday, May 23, 2014 1:28:57 PM

Post# of 68424
JJS, thanks I agree with everything you say on Petrella.
If CAFC is going to remand with instructions for 5 years more of past damages that also means they have to decide on 20.9 % x 3.5 % as the basis for those damages, no?
That would also pretty much decide the main part of the next appeal for future damages as well, although they could reduce the 6.5 % to a lower number.
Please correct me if I am wrong