Be realistic! "When you know you're right" doesn't describe MSX vs. Ransport or Fitzgerald at all. Every court that has touched this, in Canada or the US, has ruled squarely against MSX. What's most telling, I think, is that MSX's leadership and lawyers flopped around so much on their legal arguments. It's clear that the only principle involved is something along the lines of "Hey... those guys seem to have money. I want some too!"
MSX was right? Which time?
When they said that Fitzgerald was entitled to the money, but had a duty to share it with MSX? Or the time they argued that Fitzgerald was never entitled to the money, and it should have gone to Tronox? Or the time that they backed Steve Davis' falsified agreement from long before anything was ever discovered?
There may be some remaining questions on Chile, but if anyone is still clinging to Brent's story about Fitzgerald/Ranspot, it's clear that it's not because of that you know is right, but rather because of something you really, really WANT to believe.
