InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 1988
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/21/2013

Re: 4retire post# 9155

Wednesday, 05/21/2014 2:12:23 AM

Wednesday, May 21, 2014 2:12:23 AM

Post# of 38845
That's correct 4retire, they paid only 2 of the DFI shareholders and somehow own the tech that DFI didn't even own. You'd think if they were going to go with this story they would either pay off all or none. What stretch of the imagination enables them to just pay off 2?

BTW, while Simpson told everyone DFI back in early 2000 was just the original 29 plus him and Haskins, it grew when the cash investors came in, so the number was more like 40-50 who had their certs cancelled and were issued DFMI certs later in 2000. And then when the 2001 shareholder lawsuit was settled Simpson insisted on adding in another dozen or so investors from his earlier scams who were all looking for a piece of his hide.