InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 144
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: Biobillionair post# 27773

Saturday, 05/17/2014 6:39:20 AM

Saturday, May 17, 2014 6:39:20 AM

Post# of 426564
I am not surprised. As I wrote in #27382: „If Hamburg does not want to deal with this issue, maybe we get positive answer from Woodcock by October. (if Woodcock has the same attitude, Dr. Jenkins level will be reinstate the SPA by end of July)”.

ggwpg - Amarin did not lied: officially it is OND level, but technically it will decided by Hamburg (/Woodcock).

louieblouie - the question is not "is it true or not?" but "is it logical or not?"

Maybe I am wrong on reinstatement, but based on your info I guess we will get the final answer from FDA on OND level (if it will be no we have to go through the next 2 level before the court but it will be technical steps only.)

Call me optimistic, but I think the background of the appeal is strong enough for a “green lamp” from Hamburg, resulted in a positive decision from OND level and after that the sNDA will be approved (for =200 mg/dL and <500 mg/dL population with compromised label.)

pros:
- the drug is safety and effective
- the study was 100% according to the SPA
- OND level is the originally targeted level (not a surprise, since the previous two played an active role in recession of SPA)
- (I guess) the next two level does not want to deal with this appeal officially (let’s say they do not want to overturn the previous levels’ decision and they do not want to go to court.)

cons:
- negative AdCom vote, however they voted on Reduce-It
- new science, however the background is not the strongest (especially as the population in the 3 citied study were different and the sub-group data did not confirm the “new” science)

(ps.: I never requested a proof from anybody, but I always analyse the logic of the statement)
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News