InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 38
Posts 6377
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/09/2011

Re: Bostonsesco post# 217394

Friday, 05/16/2014 2:38:13 PM

Friday, May 16, 2014 2:38:13 PM

Post# of 796454
I don't think it will be bad if the meeting is not necessary. Judge(Judy)Sweeny said that they could be skipped if mutually agreed upon by both parties. The first was skipped if I recall correctly so the plaintiff's must have fallen for the defendants line of bull that they would be forthcoming with the required documentation and information. Then in the second meeting which did take place the plaintiffs complained that defendants refused to comply with discovery. The judge(Judy)Sweeny slapped the defendants around and told them that they will comply at which time defendants whined about getting the protective order ( I think that is what it is called ). Then Judge(Judy)Sweeny said this a citizens court and the citizens will have their day in court. She told the defendants that her court has jurisdiction and the defendants will comply. o.k. so if they cancel the next meeting everything is going smoothly for the plaintiffs. If they have the meeting there could be some more fireworks. I plan on fireworks because the government's only plan is to stall and Judge(Judy)Sweeny already warned them.