InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 12
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/12/2001

Re: jenna post# 1741

Saturday, 05/12/2001 4:32:48 PM

Saturday, May 12, 2001 4:32:48 PM

Post# of 25232
Jenns, In your post #1729, you wrote the opposite of what
you are saying in post #1740:

"HOMS still short looking for 26 and 25 and will hold this short. I was looking for a price target of 26.73 which is the 100 day moving average but now will look for 25 at least."

How can it be that in post #1740 you wrote:
"HOMS was nicely stopped by its rising 100 day moving average at 26.86 which was my target."

Others who read your calls on this thread to monitor the
results of your calls might wonder how you could post that you were looking to cover your HOMS short position at 25, but
then at the end of the trading day, after HOMS reversed to
climb to 30 at the time you posted message #1740, your next
post on the subject, you declare that you were out at 26.86.
Anyone who followed your advice lost money if they expected
you to make a timely post when you changed your exit position from a price of 25. My point is on topic and goes to the issue
of your credibility and reliability. What say you ?




Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.