![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Tuesday, May 06, 2014 6:24:54 PM
That is exactly how I heard it too. I agree that as long as there
no shenanigans that should take 35 U.S.C. 101 off the table.
I also agree that Google's counsel did not address laches in the cross-appeal. I don't know what will come of that, but I take it as a positive.
I didn't like the tone of some the questions of the judges, but I have been told not to read too much into that, because judges can play games with the attorneys in the way they delivery the questions??? to trip them? trap them? Not sure what to call it.
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM