InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 2014
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/05/2003

Re: rmarchma post# 148467

Friday, 03/10/2006 12:50:00 PM

Friday, March 10, 2006 12:50:00 PM

Post# of 433223
Ronnie: I wouldn't bet against Loop's analysis. A person can twist layman's words all they want to reach a result, however, there is probably no legal obligation for Sam to pay until the Nok arb decision is final. Doesn't mean they can't resolve their differences. I guess it comes down to what UB meant by "resolution of Sam is not tied to". These words are not legalize and have no meaning to me as a lawyer.

IMO Ghors


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News