InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 133
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2013

Re: staccani post# 9083

Monday, 04/21/2014 1:30:21 PM

Monday, April 21, 2014 1:30:21 PM

Post# of 696675
Wow, that is a very strong statement. The mouse data is in fact not known. It has not been published and it has been vaguely talked about with no level of scientific detail. I could very easily see a poster that reports on the mouse study that very nicely lays out the justification for the human study and then some preliminary results from humans. Do those preliminary results unequivocally support a systemic response? I don't know and neither do you. Unlike this message board, scientists, MDs and regulatory bodies like the FDA require a higher level of proof that something in fact works than your declaration that it does. Even simply seeing tumor regression at adjacent or remote tumors is not enough to prove that you have a systemic response. It is highly highly suggestive, but you have to check all of the boxes and show a mechanism to be able to state it. That's just how it works in science. Look at the papers that have shown systemic response. Look at how they supported the claim.....
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News