adanac... educated DD proves my point...you should do some real digging and you to will figure out what many here already have.
MORE LIKE "EDUCATED GUESSES, WHICH PROVES NOTHING
You claim that it is only opinion but you are about to be see why it is a fact and not opinion:
Insiders dumping is fact otherwise they would be holding billions of shares...yet they don't....proven fact.
FACT: YOU CANNOT TELL FOR A FACT, HOW MANY "INSIDERS THERE ARE".
IF THERE ARE HMMMMM "10 INSIDERS" EACH HOLDING 4% OF THE SHARES, NONE WOULD HAVE TO BE MADE PUBLIC INFO.
WITH HMMMMM "100 IN THE 100M (AVERAGE) CLUB" WE'VE NOW ACCOUNTED FOR 21.2 BILLION, AND WE STILL HAVE OVER 6,000 OTHER SHAREHOLDERS. AT 1M SHARES EACH, WE'RE NOW OVER THE O/S HMMMMMMMMMM HOW DID WE DO THAT. SHORTS???????
Proven Fact - Rich Capital was opened and run by John Banks...the very John Banks that runs pyct.... for the sole purpose to sign a deal for BILLIONS of shares at UNDER .0001.... undeniable.... and verifiable ... if you wish I can post the data once again....the same data that you requested be sent to the SEC 2=+months before they got DTC Chilled.
HMMMM IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING THAT STATES "THAT IS WHY THE COMPANY WAS "SET UP", BY ALL MEANS PLEASE POST IT AGAIN, AS I MUST HAVE MISSED THAT PART OF YOUR "EDUCATED DD"
Yep...it just can't be covered up anymore... I suppose you believe that there are TWO companies that are Rich Capital Enterprises Ltd...both associated with payjest(pyct) and both run by pyct management
I FOUND ONE IN TEXAS, BUT UNFORTUNATELY, IT WASN'T RUN BY PYCT MANAGEMENT, SO I GUESS YOU KEEP IGNORING THE FACT THERE ARE "MORE THAN ONE" HMMMMMMMM
LMAO...good one if you think any lawyer would buy that silly story..
AM I DEFENDING MY IDEAS WITH A LAWYER????? LOL
But pyct has to try and cover even if it is plain silly....Now add to the fact that Rich Capital not only was run by Banks, but their little secretary too...who is also the pyct patent holder just like Banks...Hmmmmm that really seems like it can't be possible but it is...and the only way that it would make sense is that pyct/ Johnny Banks were structuring shares for dumping.
SENSE TO WHO? HMMMMMM
PROVEN Fact ... lots of volume at .0001 and UNDER (and none of it is short). Hard to comprehend huh? not really...when folks dump out it happens like this.
NO, NONE IS "REPORTED SHORT"
I have proven that the shorts can't be doing it because there are no FTDs which are a required component of shorting...if you don't record a shorted trade then that trade can't be covered ...ever
SOME "MARKET MAKER" ALLOWED THAT TRADE TO GO THROUGH, MAYBE THEY DID THE SHORTING, DON'T KNOW, BUT THEY ARE ON THE HOOK TO "COVER THAT TRADE" IF AND WHEN THE SHAREHOLDER WISHES TO SELL. FACT
