InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 20264
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/14/2003

Re: None

Tuesday, 04/15/2014 4:29:57 PM

Tuesday, April 15, 2014 4:29:57 PM

Post# of 432591
How is it that the Samsugn and ZTE attorneys can tryy and argue in validity of 966 and 847 based on some Quick Qcom reference at the oral hearing in the last 2 sets of transcripts. The reason I ask is because I thought the CAFC, ITC Commission nand even the ALJ in his ID found those patents to be valid. So if they are already adjudicated in 613, how come they can be argued in 868 when IDCC could not argue issues already decided by the Commission in 800?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News