Sunday, July 18, 2004 2:54:05 PM
Reasons for using particular charts and starting time of the coming analysis should be obvious at glance from these charts
This will be a long drawn out experience.
My goal is to start from scratch and by process of elimination…
Draw a picture of the pros and cons of the modified rsi-5 buy/sell signals generator.
And possible market condition
1st…the charts I like to use Vs historical research of market conditions and start times they can be applied.
NDX because it’s cleaner “false prints”
NAAD Nasdq related indictor runs the full distance of time.
I would really like to use the QQV and 21ma… as it is a QQQ specific historical/current measurement of volatility that has direct effect on the premium I/we pay for QQQ options. But as you see it did not come into existence until 2001
I’m trying to Put less emphasis on the P/C for obvious visual reasons but the 200ma crossings are interesting.
Furthermore; after hearing that Stockcharts keys off of CBOE data and my recent distrust/findings of CBOE’s data inconsistencies “not adding up” leads me to believe that errors are abundant… so lets leave it out and narrow this down a bit
TRINQ: Recently… I like the idea of using the 5&10ma’s Vs 1.50 horizontal line. The compression of the chart due to the spikes in 1999 will cause me to start this analysis after that date. Since the QQV did not start until 2001.... ... ...
NAHGH Nasdq related indictor runs the full distance of time.
NAMO does not start until 1998... see next post
This will be a long drawn out experience.
My goal is to start from scratch and by process of elimination…
Draw a picture of the pros and cons of the modified rsi-5 buy/sell signals generator.
And possible market condition
1st…the charts I like to use Vs historical research of market conditions and start times they can be applied.
NDX because it’s cleaner “false prints”
NAAD Nasdq related indictor runs the full distance of time.
I would really like to use the QQV and 21ma… as it is a QQQ specific historical/current measurement of volatility that has direct effect on the premium I/we pay for QQQ options. But as you see it did not come into existence until 2001
I’m trying to Put less emphasis on the P/C for obvious visual reasons but the 200ma crossings are interesting.
Furthermore; after hearing that Stockcharts keys off of CBOE data and my recent distrust/findings of CBOE’s data inconsistencies “not adding up” leads me to believe that errors are abundant… so lets leave it out and narrow this down a bit
TRINQ: Recently… I like the idea of using the 5&10ma’s Vs 1.50 horizontal line. The compression of the chart due to the spikes in 1999 will cause me to start this analysis after that date. Since the QQV did not start until 2001.... ... ...
NAHGH Nasdq related indictor runs the full distance of time.
NAMO does not start until 1998... see next post
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
