[Added table of patent-expiration dates for big-selling biopharmaceuticals.]
The term follow-on-biologic (FoB) has come into vogue as a descriptor for a protein drug that is similar to an already-approved drug. Other terms that are used are biogeneric and biosimilar.
FoB’s are an avenue for GTC to leverage its proprietary production platform. By definition, an FoB is similar to another drug and hence it can’t readily be differentiated based on characteristics of the drug itself (but see info below on ADCC). Hence, the surest way to capture significant market share and still realize a robust profit margin is to have rock-bottom production costs. This can be accomplished in two main ways: 1) by producing in a low-cost region; or 2) by employing a low-cost production technology.
Companies such as Teva, Novartis/Sandoz, Barr (Pliva), and Mylan (Merck KGaA) are pursuing the former path; companies such as GTC, SemBioSys, and Biolex are pursuing the latter.
-- Which branded drugs are the best candidates for a FoB?
#msg-20699044 Largest classes of biopharmaceuticals #msg-23029249 Patent-expiration dates for selected biopharmaceuticals
-- What about the US regulatory climate for FoB’s?
-- Are there technical advantages that GTC’s FoB’s might provide relative to the branded counterparts?
One such advantage might be enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Dr. Cox mentioned ADCC prominently in #msg-17607391 (scan about halfway down), and Dr. Meade talked about it at the annual shareholders' meeting.
Moreover, GTC has a patent application on the production of antibodies with enhanced ADCC (#msg-20219243).
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.