Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
so, is there a no bid situation going on here today? what the heck?
Are you saying that you got the same Email that Reed received or is this a re-post?
Or something else...... hmmm
Garde,
It is common in legal documents for parties to sign seperate copies of the same document. This is because sometimes not everyone can be in the same place to sign, so someone signs a copy.
I do this in my job all the time in legal settlement agreements and such. May seem strange, but I dont think its an issue. She is probably in CHina and had a copy faxed to her to sign.
D.
Wow what a list of vendors. What catches my attention in the PR is this
"...The target market for Syscon products extends well beyond bars and nightclubs.
Any licensed establishment, such as licensed restaurants and hotels, are ideal
candidates for Syscon's product line."
Hotels and Resturants are the customers that will want this service and they are pointing them out. This helps me out being a little more positive knowing that we have a real product and are takeing steps to market it.
I have a friend that installed a drink controll system in his bar about 3 years ago. He LOVED it because he was able to keep an eye on the overages his bartenders were pouring into the drinks. The customers HATED it though. I mean Hated it. No more strong mixed drinks, or asking the bartender for a little extra with a tip. Everything was controlled.
He ended up removing the system. Mostly because of the bar customers complaining. Its a very small town with the same people all the time. So he did what was good for him and keeping the boozers happy.
Bottom line is that a system like this does increase profits. If installed in a hotel bar, as advertised, then patrons won't know the difference, or at a sports bar where people come in no matter what. It just didnt fly in a small town bar where we just got "pay at the pump" gas stations.
looks like TLGP is the shell that will become Good Life. EFGO/Monarc will be left with IFGX and then merge with Camden.No wonder they wanted to keep IFGX becuse without it, EFGO would be empty after this sale of assets.
what does that mean for current shareholders? we get our 1-1000 with the new Monarc/Camden company and then what ever the divi is with the TLGP/Goodlife company.?
Sounds like when the dust settles what is left for EFGO is Camden and IFGX. Goodlife will be on their own.
IMO
thanks,
I dont think that everything with this outfit is smoke and mirrors but I accept some as a possibility. I also do not beleive that everyone involved is smart enough ( or insert a softer term such as educated enough) to pull off this deal without some missteps or full blown foulups. EOM
I am under the impression that the company is now under the "control" of GL officers etc. if so then its all GL's to do what they want with it and even if they are not running the show I dont think its that complicated.
They are spinning off and the orginal deal might have included them taking what ever they wanted with them. EFGO could have told them in the inatial negotation 's "take what you want etc" who knows. But think for a moment that when everyone is sitting at the round table trying to hammer the details out that Camden says " hey, it would be nice if Monarc could keep this IFGX division, how about it GL? Please?" its really the best time to do it.
Things change or come up when hammering out deals. Havent we all bought a car and got to signing the papers and the F/I guys says, oh there is one more thing... When you thought it was a done deal? I usualy ask for something extra at this point beacuse they want the sale, and dont want to blow the deal right at the end. Not sure if that applies to everyone here but thats what I think about.
All in my opinion...
Exactly. Canden may have negotated with GL to keep IFGX so GL didnt take it to the new pink or sell it. Could it be possible that this was a sticking point with Canden in the deal?
Scottrade send me the PR in an email so it is on there somewhere.
My ST account isnt showing news, but I did get an email from them with the PR.
Scottrade
I have had 1mm on the block at .0002 since Oct 23. GTC no restrictions.
I do not have as large of a position as some of people here but I am holding and waiting, but I wanted to see if there was any liquidity in this stock at all.
I would think that someone would have a buy order in @ .0002 somewhere.
DW
Semi-Idiot here who put some .0002's for sale 2 weeks ago just to see..... they are still sitting there, mocking me.
Ive had a 1M order in at .0001 for 3 days and no fill.
Lurking with 2.6 mill.
Hi All. Been a lurker for 3 months. Thanks to all the regulars for their DD. Way too much for me to do on my own, and reading all of it took enough time as it is. Once agian thank you.
Anyway, I found this on another board and thought it was interesting. Not sure if I am violating the terms by a copy and past job, and if I am please let me know. First post an all jazz.
Posted by: turbosetch
In reply to: turbosetch who wrote msg# 22631 Date:6/26/2007 12:22:18 PM
Post #of 22683
All I can find right now but a good read..
I was an OTC MM for about 10 years ending in the late 80's. Since then I have been strictly an investor. Since I have not been that up to date in MM rules I will only make statements that I feel fairly confident are still accurate regarding these activities. By and large most MM don't have a clue nor do they care to learn, about the fundamentals of the stocks they trade.
They just try to make orderly markets. When dealing with BB stocks it is very easy for a MM to get trapped into being short in dealing in a fast moving market. Reason being; most of the MM's in this stock are what are called "wholesalers" this means they don't have retail brokers "working" the stocks.
So they have to rely on what's known as the "call" from larger retail houses. If a "Big" retail firm like an E-trade calls up a market maker to purchase say 5,000 shares of a stock, they expect to get an "execution" from that market maker. If he turns them down, or only gives a partial then the "Big" firm will go to another MM.
If this second MM "fills the order" then that "Big" firm has a moral obligation to continue to give future "business" in that stock to that MM who performed (his life blood). This will go on until he "fails" to perform and so on.
Contrary to popular opinion the "Big" firms Do NOT neccessarily go to the "Low Offer" to fill a buy order (Or high bid for a sell). They "Go" to who they think will perform to fill the order and expect that MM to "match" the "low offer" in the case of a buy (bid in the case of a sell). Even though this MM might in fact be the "high bid" and not really want to sell any more.
As a wholesaler he must perform or he will get a reputation as a "non-performer" with the "Big" houses and will cease getting "calls" which means he will soon go out of business. I mentioned above that this activity is very significant to BB stocks. I say this because most of the trades in these BB stocks are "unsolicited" and are done through discount houses.
With the above groundwork laid, let me try to explain how market makers get short even if they like the Company; Lets say that a stock (shell) has been lying quietly at $.25 bid $.50 offered. A limit order comes into one of the MM's to Buy at $.50 for a thousand shares. Prior to this trade that MM may be "flat" (neither long or short any shares). He fills the order and is now short 1,000 shares. He may raise his bid hoping to find a seller to "flatten" out his position. But before he realizes it a wave of buyers have come in and cleared out all the $.50 offers. Now the stock is $.50 bid .75 offered. Here comes that "Big" firm he just sold the 1,000 shares to at .50 with another bid for 1000 at .75. He makes this print. Now he is short 2,000 at an average of .625. The market keeps moving and now its .75 bid 1.00 offered. Now he has to make a decision.
Just like investors, MM Hate to take a loss. So 9 times out of 10 he will now sell 2000 at 1.00 making him short 4000 but with an average .81. At this time he would love to see a seller at .75 so he can cover his short and make a few bucks.
But instead the market keeps moving up. Now it is 1.00 to 1.25 and here comes the buyer again at 1.25. He doesn't want to lose the call so now he needs to sell 4,000 at 1.25 to keep his break even point above the bid. Now he is short 8,000. Market moves up to 1.25 bid 1.50 offer here comes the buyer now he feels he must sell 8000 here because "stocks don't go up forever".
Now he is short 16,000. And so on and so on. If the stock keeps moving up, before he realizes it he could be short 50k or 100k shares (depending how big his bank is). _________________________
Finally the market closes for the day and on paper he may look all right in that his "break even" price may be around the closing price. But now he has to figure out how to entice sellers so he can cover this short. It is important to note that if this happened to one MM it has probably happened to most all of them.
Some ways MM's entice sellers; Run the stock up with a "tight spread" in a fast market, then "open" up the spread to slow down the buying interest. After it has "cooled off" for a little while lower the offer below the last trade right after a small piece trades on the offer then tighten the spread so that the sellers feel they can take a "quick profit" by "hitting the bid" on the tight spread.
Once the selling starts the MM's will walk it down quickly by only making small prints on the way down with the tight spread. Another way is by running the stock up in the morning, averaging up their short then use the above technique to walk it down in the afternoon.
Hopefully after doing this for several days, it will demoralize the buyers. The volume will dry up and the sellers will materialize thinking that the game is over.
Contrary to popular opinion, MM usually Do Not Cover in Fast moving markets either Up or Down if they are short. They Short More. They usually try to cover after the frenzy is out of the market. There are many other techniques they use but the above are the most popular.
This technique works about 9 times out of 10 particularly in a BB market. However that is because 9 out of 10 BB stocks are BS. Remember what I said above. Most MM's don't have a clue as to the value of a Company until they get trapped. If the Company has solid fundementals and a bright future. Then the stock will do very well. And the activity that caused the situation will prove to even help the future stock activity because it created an audience."
True, but we are back where we were months ago. Disapointing..
its out on Market Watch
Clixme Targets $10.5 Billion in Rich Media Spending, Releases New Flash Client for Rich Media Ads