Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This is BS. I rephrased nothing. How is someone posting under my ID. ADMIN. ADMIN. ADMIN. WTF is going on here?
Let me rephrase that. If a tree fell once, what makes anyone think they will hear it his time?
If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it (or chooses to ignore it) does it make a sound?
Nobody's heard it thus far - time to make more noise?
What is the contingency plan?
July 27th they must respond.
BCIT is removed when? July 31st?
Sounds like a perfect legal storm for the big F-U from the 'system'.
If Megas will not address the filing issues, (understood) then there better be a contingency plan in place. This is setting itself up for another 4 years of legal BS as opposed to a settlement which is well past due. If you need $$ for the lawyer let me know. I would think we could have the paperwork filed by Tuesday. I would also think that the media could be on-board before Wednesday.
At this point I chalk it up to The cost of Justice??
Don't take this the wrong way. I consider myself somewhat of an optimist in day-to-day life, but when it comes to David vs. Goliath type stuff I have to switch to realist mode. I guess it's just me being repetitively beat down by the people I pay to protect me.
-Big shout out to my gov-ment type people. Who-Hoo.
Wow. You could own 1/2 of the company for less than the cost of a GTM?
But if the RS is just a "smoke screen" to retire shares at .0001, once Peter has enough the RS can be canceled and float adjusted without hurting shareholders.
125K could cut the structure in half.
Method for the madness.....
Would the filing for a RS ensure the share price stay down while Peter buys to retire shares? Wouldn't he be able to retire say 1/2 billion shares for 50K? Just wondering. If this has been discussed I apologize.
Don't worry, it's gonna be OK. I just got off the phone with the Internet and they said everything will just fine. RVGD is on it's way. (dry humor)
I want to thank this guy UncleMeatball who convinced me to invest based on some Wallmart plastic chairs in a garage in Indiana. This will forever be my criteria to gauge a solid investment. (additional dry humor)
To me the PR says "keep your enemies closer". Brilliant.
As for future 'dumping' of shares, I believe there was an email from Chad stating that if this were to be done again it would happen well above the penny mark.
I want to say thanks to the original crew and those that have put forth the extra effort. Teamwork is never allowing others to fail. GLTA Monday.
From the EEGI board. Not confirmed.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26349507
After 3hrs and 20min the response Fidelity gave me is trades can not be placed due to pending litigation.
I apologize if this has already been addressed. The Cert Megas sent to the DTC, is that for the 106's or 205's? If he chose to validate the 106's there is no need for the 205's. Correct? Has the issue of 106 vs. 205 gone away and the DTC needs to communicate to the Brokers that 106's are valid? If Legacy has not heard from Megas in months maybe they are not aware of the CUSIP the Cert validates? Just asking...
If you check now BCIT is quoted by Fidelity. The 'Invalid' status must have changed. This does not point to trading or not. In the end I am curious about buying and selling. Hope Fidelity is playing fair. I think they are being cautiously optimistic. The end results will be determined 12/24/07 AM. Please do let me/us know if you find anything out. I plan to be on the phone w/Fidelity 7:00am Central tomorrow am and will post my findings.
Keeping all my digits crossed. Happy Holidays and GLTY and all of us.
Thanks. Noticed a week or so ago that BCIT showed invalid ticker symbol on watch list. It had been there for over 2 years with no problems. Next thing you know my GTC order 'expired'. Hope they allow for a level playing field.
It's been a while, but if I remember correctly you and 500 were Fidelity customers. Any word from them as to trading status? Spent almost 2 hours on hold this weekend and have no answers to show for it.
Agreed. Funny part is you have some guy named meatball, some wallmart chairs, and a company with stellar fundementas.
Its like a recipe... take one seasoned penny investor, one CEO, and two wallmart chairs. Mix well with a pinch of upcoming legislation. Garnish with a shovel and enjoy.
Have been watching but more and more I am very interested.
Has a penny stock ever stuck it to the MM's?
Like I was saying...
Posted by: wingnut2dot0
In reply to: Ranzy MD who wrote msg# 7646
Date:11/30/2007 6:23:07 PM
Post #of 7707
Unless the company continues to buy back and retire.
Though not intended to constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities, the company reserves the right to buy back the company’s common stock from time to time. The company may seek to make additional purchases in the future and will keep the investment community updated appropriately.
I think we know who owns the float yet the volume speaks numbers(thats a joke). I think the company may have just handed the MM's a shovel.
Oh yea, and there is that short ting too. Next week, correct?
What if the short just got larger while the float got smaller(see above) and the descision to release/not release the PR facilitated it.
750k +
Unless the company continues to buy back and retire.
Though not intended to constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities, the company reserves the right to buy back the company’s common stock from time to time. The company may seek to make additional purchases in the future and will keep the investment community updated appropriately.
I think we know who owns the float yet the volume speaks numbers(thats a joke). I think the company may have just handed the MM's a shovel.
Oh yea, and there is that short ting too. Next week, correct?
What if the short just got larger while the float got smaller(see above) and the descision to release/not release the PR facilitated it.
There is a column like this in most major papers. Couldn't hurt if all were to copy them on any correspondence.
Chicago Tribune Problem Solver
E-mail us your story at yourproblem@tribune.com or write to What's Your Problem, Newsroom, Chicago Tribune, 435 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago, IL 60611. Please include your name, a way to contact you and as many specifics as possible. We cannot respond to everyone, but we'll get to as many as we can.
FUCT.ob seems to fit better.
What about a class action suite against Megas? Tit-4-tat (the friendly version)? Wouldn't that bring many things to light? Things a Judge would be required to act on? Megas has quite a bit of evidence to prove he is not at fault?
If Megas were to rescind the 205 PR BS, lets say on Oct 15th, would the 106's trade? Any issues regarding conterfits, NSS, and FTD's would be between who? Wouldn't all the court doc's compiled up to this point be very helpful in pointing out what is legit and who holds valid shares? Would the remainder be considered 'shorts' which are now required to be addressed?
Need to stay grounded, got any more of that 'reality' on ya? Would love to hear your opinion if you have the time.
1%er.
Thanks. Enjoy the weekend.
Cool HUMID breeze. Might be up there this weekend. Keep in touch.
Let him know people are wondering if they should file a 4 or not.
In Chicago (lake geneva) yet?
We all do. You should see my list.
Numbers rock, its the emotions that mess everything up. That is where Clarity comes in.
Not a problem. I apologize if I offended. I was referring to Sir Clarity. I appreciate his insight. Its tough to argue with numbers. BUNM involves more than that an I encourage Clarity to look into it. Ever heard of a Fibonacci Flutter, or any other Clarityism? COOL stuff.
Clarity,
Once you have absorbed what is going on and who the company is, please provide us with your insight. Dont mean to create more work, but nice to be in from the beginning, as well as hear your thoughts. Thanks for taking the time.
Respectfully,
wingnut
Its Clarity789(SIR). Watch and learn stuff that makes a diff.
Thanks Clarity,
Nice to see some math behind the speculation. Keep in mind the speculation is the COOL part. Just requesting your 'grounded' observations. If you dont mind, aside from the T/A, would you be able to provide your opinion on the big picture? This might be a good one to watch.
Respectfully,
wingnut.
You know him. You love him........
I have asked Clarity789 to add some insight. I apologize if I have offended, but I find that his work is very informative. Looking forward to Clarity's input as well as tomorrows trading.
Clarity...........
If you and your calculator can handle it, you insight it requested on the BUNM board. Sorry for the intrusion WNSH peoples, but these 2 are neck and neck.
can not PM. Please let me know how I can contact you. Thanks.
PS. I want you to manage my money. Joke.
Edit: My Money is the Joke.
Just curious. Where are you going?
Understand. Thanks.
EDIT:
Thought this might help in cases like this.
Posted by: clarity789
In reply to: ChangeDirector who wrote msg# 16767
Date:7/25/2007 1:10:34 PM
Post #of 18889
Sure - I use the term 'problem shares' to describe shares that should not be there.
These shares could be caused by company dilution. Or even - as was the case with BHUB - illegal/unregistered shares.
They could also be the result of either/both shorting or naked shorting.
And of course, they could be a mixture of any or all the above... but the point remains, they do not belong in the float.
I would like to help incorporate a trade matching component to your calculations.
Posted by: wingnut2dot0
In reply to: doinit who wrote msg# 18863
Date:7/29/2007 4:54:04 PM
Post #of 18885
Cant PM. Not a problem, and thanks for the reply. My goal was to provide additional value to the analysis clarity789 does. Share count is one thing, but the ability to match the info to the volume of any given day could provide clarity789 with the means to remove some of the unknowns or assumptions from his work. I think that guy does some great work. You cant argue with math. By the way, where is he? I have called all the hospitals.
The database of any days trades already exists. It's just a matter of presenting that data and giving everyone the ability to log in and select the transactions that were theirs. I dont know just thinking out loud. Never mind, putting myself on ignore.
Posted by: wingnut2dot0
In reply to: None
Date:7/28/2007 11:19:03 PM
Post #of 18885
If anyone is interested I can set up a quick and dirty site where you can add your transactions (DATE, TIME, BROKER, ROUTING, SHARES, etc.) this information could be then be turned over to clarity789 for analysis.
This could be password protected (you would need to log in) so the 'observers' could not have access. This might help clarity789 eliminate some of the unknowns. I am not sure that posting this info publicly would help the cause from a MM standpoint.
* there seems to be somewhat of a catch 22 with WNSH PR's - Please help me understand.
The more positive info WNSH releases the higher their buyback price could become (unless their done) this also seems to increase the rate of short covering. In the end the PPS increases, but not nearly as much as it would if the company acted in 'sniper mode'.
Just my thoughts. Let me know if I should get to work on the site.
Side note - I don't post, just watch and hopefully learn. A lot of big brains here, thanks for the education.
Clarity, can not PM. Please contact me.
Please.