Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You could provide proof of anything you want and as long as you continue to present it the way you do especially with the name calling it lacks any credibility. The approach most of you "heroes" take is nothing less than confrontational. If you want to be taken seriously, the "heroes" should act a bit more civil.
As for me, I remain optimistic for something to come out of this mess. Soon? No.
zzzzzz, someone call lebed!
Nope, not mine. I have some listed over .01, but it's AON so I doubt it will be shown on level 2 anyhow.
Looks to be cheaper today, no bites?
Come on volume! zzzzz
Any news on any fronts? Jim stopped sending out group e-mails some time ago.
And yes, I hear it already, no revenues, no projects, etc.
I just thought there was supposed to be an update earlier in the year and if the update was the conference call/meeting, I heard that didn't go over so well.
yashidashi
There is nothing to tell here. A few 'pump and dump' groups started touting this around a few boards a little while ago to get some momentum and then bailed.
yashidashi
I have yet to see the A/S or O/S grow to support the idea of them selling shares. As a matter of fact, they have reduced both counts.
Now the sale of PDR's out of the Dallas office is another story and there's no clear story on that other than it was not legit.
As for the rest, it's your opinion and entitled to such.
yashidashi
I have never spoken with Pedro, but I still hold some hope. I bought into this for the long term. Yes, I am unhappy with what has transpired here, but when I am as unhappy as many people who post here are, I simply move on. There's no newbies to "save", there's no PR campaign to invite people here, so please let a sleeping dog lie and quit beating it to death.
yashidashi
Last I heard he was broke? How can he be paying people to work for him if that's the case?
This is all pointing back towards Brookstone Securites.
http://brokercheck.finra.org/Individual/IndividualSummary.aspx?SearchGroup=Individual&FirmKey=-1&BrokerKey=1493452
Previously was Carlton Captial though I believe that was Lou's company or something close.
ALBERT G. WARDI
CRD# 1493452
Currently employed by and registered with the following FINRA Firms:
BROOKSTONE SECURITIES, INC.
120 WALL STREET
24TH FLOOR
NEW YORK, NY 10005
CRD# 13366
Registered with this firm since: 11/26/2008
In the full PDF it shows the employer location as Lakeland, FL.
Many of the people still posting here is for entertainment purposes. It seems Pedro believes Cuba is the key and until something happens there, we do nothing here but sit.
yashidashi
mdavid40 does nothing but entertain himself here and knows no secrets about PNMS.PK. There's nothing new underway that can be disclosed or it would have been made public by the company by now.
yashidashi
So, is the TA gagged or has anyone had news what the O/S and A/S is besides the e-mail? Not questioning the validity of that e-mail, just looking for the numbers.
yashidashi
Was or is? The stock is still active, but you never know what's going to happen in pinky land. I still hold out hope that something happens here and people can recover most if not all of their investments.
yashidashi
I don't really see that happening, but who knows, maybe the beefing up of the SEC will see to that. Then the SEC will only still be thousands of agents short.
yashidashi
I'd imagine you could find a few hundred million shares out there at these prices. You still need volume to move it no matter what the size.
yashidashi
I don't see there being anywhere near $100,000 traded within the last year. As far as the shares go, you know I can't give you an honest answer to that. Also, good luck finding out where all the shares are with any public company. Everything isn't rumors, but there is a lot of unverifiable information.
People still waiting on their money, I haven't seen anything delivered on time here since the ticker change that I can recall.
yashidashi
I guess the thing is, when I got in, I was already willing to hold onto this for 5-10 years, I wasn't looking short term. I know that starting a business can be rough, but this has definitely been a lot of smoke and mirrors. There is little verifiable information, but that there is any at all gives me a small glimmer of hope.
yashidashi
It's okay, and I guess one reason that Theresa never contacted me... I have my shares in a retirement account. Don't really have the free flowing cash they were looking for or something along those lines.
yashidashi
Don't call me bro, but alright, I guess I don't understand that whole process. You buy shares, she sends shares, then you have them signed and send them back? I remember there being a discussion about that, but no one was ever clear on it (and not a surprise with this company). There is definitely a lot of mistakes and misdirection, I don't deny that.
yashidashi
Fact: I never heard anyone claiming that PNMS.PK shares were being sold out of the Dallas office. Go take a look at the shares traded for over the past year and tell me someone made anything resembling a decent paycheck for one person let alone more. I never said anything resembling that they were doing a great job with the company, only that I failed to see how they were making lots of money ripping off PNMS.PK.
Where do you get your facts from and how do you read between the the lines which are not there?
yashidashi
I have seen zero proof that any shares have been sold by MT or Pedro, so I see how you have anything to stand on there. The rumors of selling PDR's out the back door don't really apply either as it was not PNMS.PK stock. I fail to see how you could get PNMS.PK halted as a money making scam as it's pretty obvious there isn't enough volume to even come close to supporting that.
yashidashi
What newbies? You're telling me that maybe 2 people bought up around 500 million shares or however many it was? That and the "newbies" seemed to have bought since then, not during that time period.
yashidashi
Thing I find equally as curious, who bought all those shares?
Aren't insiders supposed to file forms to sell? Or is that only certain exchanges? I can never keep it all straight.
yashidashi
Hey guys, been in this since August 2007 and just reading up on the newest happenings. One thing that I noticed is that the reports on the O/S jumped over 150M in one month. I sort of find this hard to believe that both the one in January and the one if February could both be correct considering there was an average of less than 150M traded in those two months.
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/tradeact_mv.asp?SearchBy=issue&Issue=CGGP&SortBy=volume&Month=2-1-2008&IMAGE1.x=19&IMAGE1.y=6
yashidashi
My point is, why all of a sudden would this be a concern now if it hadn't been when the information was submitted to begin with. That and the fact that if he's just now e-mailing the company, he's forgotten do to a few other things along the way.
Identity of any kind can be used for illicit purposes in many places. If there is no history of misuse so far, why would it just now start?
I wonder how long I'd have to dig to find some other 'cuban citizen' that is doing business in some form or another in the U.S. If he's the owner, that'd be worse than a CEO, right?
yashidashi
What, you think your passport would all of a sudden start being useful other than a means of identification just now? That and you're willing to wait one day for an answer from a company that has been known for delays? I'm really not sure how to even address that one.
yashidashi
Yeah, unfortunately I'm not showing any trades either. There has been a few of those days recently.
yashidashi
I am not expecting a run real soon here and for one reason - Volume. Yes, paying the 1yr PDR's will help. Yes, audited financials would really help. Both of these would help with volume, but I'm not sure without a buildup of volume beforehand that the price here at PNMS.PK will move anywhere near fair value.
I am here for the long haul, I just don't expect much happening at PNMS.PK for some time.
yashidashi
I will agree that a lot of things coming from the company have not exactly been clear. I do think, however, that things are improving. Dwelling on the past tends to be counterproductive, but you still need to refer to it to see any progress made.
yashidashi
Following the thread, does that make you a self-proclaimed basher? At any rate, I don't see how two "wrongs" can make a "right". If you don't like the way a company is doing things and you emulate that, it actually brings you down to that level.
Just something to think about.
yashidashi
That's definitely the truth. You never know where out in left field some of those guys are reaching from. There are some legitimate complaints, but even those are lost in the mud.
I think most of the believers have packed up and left this board. I just didn't get invited to the party. Only speculation on my part.
yashidashi
It sounds like a point was being made to check out the exchange itself rather than asking him the question. I don't know if MT posted that or not as OA never said where it was posted, only that it was posted and removed.
And as far as the name, I have known a handful of people who spelled the name Micheal so I don't know why you insist that it's misspelled.
yashidashi
Yes, and all investors read Ihub. You really should stay away from that statement. There are still several 'investors' with shares in IRAS as well.
yashidashi
So you would rather there be no company communication, even if things on the blog might be getting taken care of? A few things from the last PR have been done. They might not have been huge things to most people, but it looks to me that at least there is an effort to try to rebuild some credibility.
I for one appreciate information rather than total quiet.
yashidashi
Funny, PNMS was pre-gold rush at least once in the past, and if I recall, the stock went down, so much for logical.
yashidashi
I'm not saying you couldn't be right, but the reasoning that we were given for the restructuring is so that PNMS.PK would allow better financial information related to the fund.
That is from the PR released on February 29, 2008.
yashidashi