The more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So you agree, thanks. We had an excellent .80ish pullback today.
We win lol!
Also think in terms of low float and little shorting. (Although the board has various opinions about the short position).
(This post about) daily pullbacks have been very effective at moving the pps higher overtime. Just my opinion. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165055341
I like this guy’s videos. But find it curious why accumulation at a .50ish pullback today and now an an additional .30ish pullback has no meaning. Pps does daily pullbacks. His definition is for those wanting to build a position at lower level and likely at the expense of some longs.
I disagree with his comments about nobody can know this that and the other about settlements when there are numerous facts on record…from CEO comments, particularly that he expects billions, to other high $ settlements have real value attached to them that can and have formed reasonable price targets.
So I understand the guys dilemma but I think he is not being candid enough.
Read that, a piece of legal “art”. Thanks
On 7/7 and 7/14 the pps dipped below the low of the previous day, but nonetheless part of the overall climb so far.
Fact is, so far, most dips have been interday and by that I mean anytime in a single day.
"This was a great play if you got in under a dollar." What the heck? Makes no sense. Hod today $9.98... I think perhaps that is the most misguided post I have ever heard.
I dunno…I do now $NLST will make new highs.
Thank you, an encouraging thing to say!
Closest anyway, maybe exceed!
There is nothing about an infringement case that I’ve seen pointing to the destruction of a company’s ability to conduct business. Not about that kind of justice imo. All about money/value should have received finally delivered in some form. Just my view based on other cases.
Just in time…July 19, 22 and 29.
Huge! Houston we have liftoff!
Yeah, maybe. Clock is ticking cause G and N have signed an agreement to do discovery.
Going to put that in my re-post regularly list.
Well the judge that heads up the mediation process for N v G said G had to allow discovery including financial if G wants to discuss intervening rights.
Somebody’s are shakin’
Seems to me CEO said something about HYBRIDimm and this fall. Ready for production on small scale?
Thanks for posting my personal pick for post of the day. A lot is packed into those few paragraphs.
Rats! rats no no I really mean rats (not mice)
Nice!!! You bet let’s go!
I can think of no reason why not.
Wow N does a great job seeing potential problems and moves the chessboard around appropriately
I read this stuff but my eyes glaze over, so get I get an overview but don’t retain details. Thanks for those positive details!
ARWR that drop was bs company voluntarily shut down early safety testing in mice. No relationship to the active value in pipeline.
How could NLST avoid a pr on that? Makes no sense to me. I hope I’m wrong wrong wrong. Big surprise coming if so.
A little Sunday reading:
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-heres-why-shorts-will-have-cover-week
That's hysterical JJ, thanks for the laugh.
Yeah NLST already qualifies for double digits based on tangible stuff Sk and a reasonable settlement with G in not too distant future. The Fool didn't even venture a guess at what might justify double digits for SGOC. How could anyone owning at $2 expect such a move?
Rhetorical
Your last post was on 3/24/32 MUHAHAHA!
No, wish I had is there a link?
Sure but only so many openings if half must be independent. I get what you mean now. Someone that was a department head in Micron until they retired in 2012, I can see someone like that acting as an independent board member.
Yeah no slots in my brain for dates. My best friend is my phone calendar alert. lol
Thank you! When is it?
I hope there is Q&A and you will share?
A customer would certainly not be considered independent. But they are not objective and could possibly influence independent board members.
So I guess the door is open to have a customer on the board, if I had a public company can't see myself doing that.
"With certain exceptions for controlled companies both the NYSE and Nasdaq require that a majority of Board members be independent, and the Board must conduct regular executive sessions of the independent directors (at least two times per year under the Nasdaq listing standards)."
"NASDAQ. Definition. “Independent director” is one who board “affirmatively determines” has no “material. relationship with company “either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer."