The more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I don’t think they are justified in being bitter criminals just makes them more suspect.
Yeah we gave away appliances manufacturing to Korea too.
S seems bitter, anything but face the facts I guess.
NLST short interest continues to decline:
DATE SHORT INTEREST % CHANGE AVG. DAILY SHARE VOL DAYS TO COVER SPLIT NEW ISSUE
08/13/2021 1,035,628 -36.80 4,066,791 1 No No
07/30/2021 1,638,640 -27.39 7,570,110 1 No No
07/15/2021 2,256,753 -22.47 8,694,474 1 No No
06/30/2021 2,910,957 2.03 2,631,750 1.11 No No
06/15/2021 2,852,975 0.16 790,572 3.61 No No
05/28/2021 2,848,546 -3.42 835,567 3.41 No No
05/14/2021 2,949,296 0.09 1,104,883 2.67 No No
04/30/2021 2,946,582 10.05 891,815 3.3 No No
04/15/2021 2,677,565 31.51 5,890,121 1 No No
03/31/2021 2,035,950 -0.21 1,278,694 1.59 No No
Short interest has been dropping since May:
DATE SHORT INTEREST % CHANGE AVG. DAILY SHARE VOL DAYS TO COVER SPLIT NEW ISSUE
08/13/2021 1,035,628 -36.80 4,066,791 1 No No
07/30/2021 1,638,640 -27.39 7,570,110 1 No No
07/15/2021 2,256,753 -22.47 8,694,474 1 No No
06/30/2021 2,910,957 2.03 2,631,750 1.11 No No
06/15/2021 2,852,975 0.16 790,572 3.61 No No
05/28/2021 2,848,546 -3.42 835,567 3.41 No No
05/14/2021 2,949,296 0.09 1,104,883 2.67 No No
04/30/2021 2,946,582 10.05 891,815 3.3 No No
04/15/2021 2,677,565 31.51 5,890,121 1 No No
03/31/2021 2,035,950 -0.21 1,278,694 1.59 No No
rsi at 18 on 5 min chart
$15 bb makes google the king of all phone search. How much will they pay to be the king of memory processing?
Me too.
Couldn't hurt we might learn something new.
Searched for Vanguard position in Netlist:
https://money.cnn.com/quote/shareholders/shareholders.html?symb=NLST&subView=institutional
https://fintel.io/so/us/nlst?d=2021-06-30
I’m ready for a bit of clarity!
OK this post makes the time line clear and as such the argument for settlement:
Reddit
What you say makes sense. But wasn’t the case dismissed?
Also it’s possible the sellers have greater responsibility if they were willfully doing so.
That 2nd link is for 8/2012. They were all having a party on NLST treasure.
NLST-Best place to grow your investment now and into the future. Nothing but money coming this way.
Internet Highway is a toll road and NLST tech will be the gatekeeper.
From YMB: silvia6 (why hold NLST long term)
I was speaking with a friend of mine yesterday who has been invested in NLST for many years. She was down on her investment for much of that time as she started investing above $1. We were speaking about NLST and what the future holds when she blurted out, "until someone figures out a better way and makes NLST technology obsolete." And though I was not surprised by the comment (I've heard terms like "reverse engineering", etc. for years), it still didn't sit well with me.
But as I considered it further, I reflected on the fact that NLST invented rank multiplication and load reduction over a decade ago. And though all the memory makers affiliated with JEDEC have known of it and have used it for all those years, no one has been able to improve it -- or do it better. Yes, we've had 3D Xpoint and have heard of new disruptive technologies using materials like gallium arsenide, germanium, graphene, etc. - but none have panned out. The fact that NLST uses established materials (i.e., silicon) and does it in a way that makes it a cheaper and faster way to transfer data is the brilliance of what they do.
I thought about Shark Tank and how the cast members want a "barrier to entry" before they will invest in a company. Netlist seems to have built a moat around their technology based on patents they discovered doing contract work for companies like Dell and HP. And though the use of "obviousness" claims at the patent appeals board by NLST opponents have unfairly reduced the strength of some of their patents, NLST has certainly shown they have enough arrows in their quiver to bring those same opponents to the negotiating table.
And now that they have sufficient funding to pressure all infringers to negotiate, it is ironic that the term "obviousness" is the perfect word that answers the question, "will memory makers/users have to pay Netlist's toll on the internet highway?"
Yes - the "obviousness" of memory maker/users having to pay the toll is becoming apparent to more and more investors.
MASSIVE UPSWING INTACT FROM $2 BASE
Nicely done DE! Thank you.
I like that definition spot on!
Have some fun already lots to celebrate. Also hope there is something to share when you get the chance.
Outlook looking clearer all the time for Netlist v Google.
Yeah g has done some incredibly terrible dishonest stuff to become wealthy at Netlist’s expense. I don’t think admitting to not knowing the law is kind or unkind.
Interesting I wonder if an attorney would recommend a cease and desist order while patents are being challenged. At any rate Sheasby uses the term “settled law” in the infringement contentions. I doubt very much he does that lightly. ASLI seems a bit of a different kind of bird. So I believe, from what I can glean in understanding the nature of the Centripetal v Cisco is a closer comparison to Netlist v Google even though Centripetal v Cisco and VSLI v Intel have similar dollar value.
I think these infringement wins of late, Centripetal and ASLI are a sign of the courts getting on top of a log jam in the justice system created by big money.
It took 2 diversion to 2 near by cities for refueling to get from AZ to OH. SW did everything they could but mother nature is a formidable force!
Based on the early record of Google behavior and the fact they signed an NDA willful seems a good bet for NLST’s case V Google. Not sure all the law looks for when determining willful though.
Thanks for sharing been stuck in the air over Chicago. Any idea what the settlement was?
Yes my estimate has expanded in the last couple weeks especially.
That billions used to mean 2 (to me) now it’s an unknown more than 2.
DAPP a designer etf has 2 OTC's in their top 10 unless they added or sold. BRPHF VYGVF
Hedge funds can't buy but people who work there can and to their good fortune so can family and friends.
BUYING AND HOLDING
GOOD TIMING
CLEAR SKIES
EXCELLENT
To not want to be in the position of relying on Samsung is reasonable unless Samsung can clean up the business culture. At this point Netlist needs to assume the fox is guarding the henhouse.
Yes good reminder, with an $8 price point we would not be under $6. But it’s like folks that set stop loses lenders have to do what they do.
Some would say closing gaps ( unrelated to value) is OCD.
Concur