The more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Having a ruling in favor of Netlist v Sk hynix should encourage other settlements or so I’ve heard.
That article says jury found intel infringement non-willful. If found willful the judge can triple the juries
numbers.
Yes yoy and C-19 year to boot!
This recent pullback to $1 resembles mid January drop to
.70. Platform/base?
He identifies bs maneuvers by attorneys (Delayers-In-Chief) and provides a fix or moves the schedule up. Administration skills are off the charts.
Apologizes if this is a repeat, found it interesting. (hmmm should Albright run for President?) I received a notice/link from Docketbird 2/26
02/12/2021 Standing Order Regarding Filing Documents Under Seal and Redacted Pleadings in Patent Cases. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. as of 2/12/2021. (bot1)
https://www.docketbird.com/court-cases/Netlist-Inc-v-SK-hynix-America-Inc-et-al/txwd-6:2020-cv-00525
A simple search brought up the standing order:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION
STANDING ORDER REGARDING
FILING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN PATENT CASES AND REDACTED
PLEADINGS
As a public forum, the Court has a policy of providing to the public full access to
documents filed with the Court. Nevertheless, parties in patent cases routinely produce and rely
on information that is confidential. Therefore, in all patent cases pending before the undersigned,
the Court hereby grants leave for any party to file materials containing confidential information
under seal without filing a separate motion seeking leave of the Court to do so. The filing party
shall file a publicly available, redacted version of any motion or pleading filed under seal within
seven days. The parties need not file redacted versions of exhibits to such documents. Exhibits
that are nonconfidential in their entirety should not be filed under seal at all. The parties shall
coordinate to make sure that the public version filing redacts information that any party deems
confidential. Redactions should be targeted to redact only that information. The publicly
available version shall be labeled “PUBLIC VERSION.” Cooperating to file the public version
shall not be deemed as agreeing that the redacted information is actually confidential.
This Order shall apply in all patent cases, but shall not require parties to file public
versions of pleadings filed before the date of this Order.
SIGNED this ___ day of February, 2021.
_________________________________________
ALAN D ALBRIGHT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/Standing%20Orders/Waco/Albright/Standing%20Order%20Regarding%20Filing%20Documents%20Under%20Seal%20In%20Patent%20Cases%20And%20Redacted%20Pleadings%20021221.pdf
Thank you gftb! Great overview...
Yeah not many can sell OTC after hours. Limits the reasons for the actions. The frantic quality narrows it down more. I’ve never been in that particular position after hours OTC frantically selling so no idea what it could mean. I have sold merely frantic and it is definitely fear, always regretted it.
I find it hard to believe MMs act out of fear. I’m going to take a stab at this saying mm(s) needed to cover some shorts from the trading day(s) and other mm(s) sold them shares. Not sure they even think like that.
Or a mm had a bulk of shares and sold some to other mm. That makes even more sense, seems to me mms are primarily concerned with spread and inventory of shrs.
The 10 American Companies With the Most Cash
"Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOGL): $121.2 billion. The Google division of the company is one of the most successful businesses in the world."
https://247wallst.com/investing/2020/03/28/the-10-american-companies-with-the-most-cash/
That's a great overview.
Yeah there is a form companies can file that excuses them from certain disclosures. That might take care of it.
Hmmm seems like next statement would not satisfy disclosure rules for public companies. But that is probably wishful thinking on my part.
You know when google lost on appeal last June, they lost messy. G told the appeals judges they did not use N’s tech so judge said bring us a server and the tech was in there. G said well the patent is no good but now we know another falsehood by g. (Source several posters)
So if g doesn’t settle before the bench trial this judge is going to stick it to them based on formulas that have been developed over the years of increasing patent litigation.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
We will have to disagree on the easy part of your purely speculative scenario.
Your post is a bit laughable. If one were to explore the case it would be wise to start with 912 and the value of NLSTs seminal products that g, at least, WAS using as they built out their dominance on the web. There is little left in terms of delay between here and a settlement number (if pre trial).
Even all the fiddle dee dee around the “trial” will be minimized by the bench trial that will take its place. It is impossible to bring in specialists to challenge 912, although they will probably try if it makes it to bench trial. What all could happen besides appealing the settlement itself after judges gavel falls only attorneys know.
In the mean time NLST is in a high demand business and growing sales.
So.......trying to layer politics over this court case is completely unnecessary and avoiding the common sense likelihood of what lies ahead.
Good to see a new 2 yr high on this run.
Tute ownership up to 78% been hovering around 50% for years. 20% short
I don't think so, court will never read that article unless it is submitted
to them. Proof the article is bs is that nobody in their right mind would give that article to a judge as proof of anything but stupidity.
Clearly the purpose is the discredit the company to the writer's audience.
So the only speculation I'm willing to offer---it is an effort to move pps south. Why?
All kinds of reasons.
On TDA those are estimates. Only the company knows the actual date and everyone will know when company announces.
Concur
Wow, so will the courts step up and right a long standing wrong? So far so good.
Both are true, we are back to infringement lawsuit that was stayed when g challenged the patents, but also infringement has been proven:
So what happened in the patent case that Netlist profoundly won?
Google hid behind the logic that the 912 was Smart Modulars.
Judge said “no the 912 belongs to Netlist “.
Google said “we aren’t really using the tech”.
Judge ordered an audit of Googles servers..
NLST tech was in google servers (pssst that's infringement)
Google challenged the validity of the patent
Stay was put in place...11 years later..
The patent is validated, certified, issued.
Now has been published.
Patent thoroughly investigated
Infringement is in the record
This is condensed info originally provided by Daylas :)
This is awesome:
https://s2.q4cdn.com/000096926/files/doc_downloads/NVDIMM-Product-Brief-v13.pdf
With thoughts about industry here:
https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/non-volatile-dual-in-line-memory-module-market (this one maybe a repost for me, but it names Netlist 1 of 3) so the 2 links confirm each other.
Re-post with new info***NLST https://netlist.com/
Short story:
*google signed a NDA with NLST to use their seminal technology
*google was bad even lied to court
*they lost their appeal
*google let date to file with scotus pass
*now back to infringement trial
*discovery is done and partway through pre-trial (Markman Hearing)
*view scheduling for final year in similar case- Centripetal v Cisco
(cisco was bad for 3 yrs google is on the hook for 11 yrs)
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=160597164
*NEW! 2/8/21 recertification published by USPTO, green light for N V g to resume trial
*NEW! Court says NLST and google must report publishing within a week
*NEW! inclusion in published patents, "52-91 are determined to be patentable"
https://stocktwits.com/Tomkila/message/285886459
*bought dips as low as .48 keep adding
*yahoo ST Reddit and ihub boards are bullish
some speculation but also good info do your own DD.
*there are active cases with other companies Sk-hynic recently lost
on 2 parts of patent 907
*scheduled markman for infringement of (NLST)patents 218, 525 and 595 3/9/2021
trial, if defendants choose, 12/2021
* SK resently lost to Netlist on appeal for 2 claims 40 & 41 on patent 907
*"Patent 907 found to be patentable against SK Hynix due to 2 claims" which SK Hynix could not justify
*NEW! SK Hynix denied request to change districts. Waco judge says no good reason for you to leave my court. Judge also moved Markman Hearing up to 3/1/21 and trial date up to 7/6/21
Here is an update maybe a few small corrections, idk been awhile:
***NLST https://netlist.com/
Short story:
*google signed a NDA with NLST to use their seminal technology
*google was bad even lied to court
*they lost their appeal
*google let date to file with scotus pass
*now back to infringement trial
*discovery is done and partway through pre-trial (Markman Hearing)
*view scheduling for final year in similar case- Centripetal v Cisco
(cisco was bad for 3 yrs google is on the hook for 11 yrs)
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=160597164
*NEW! 2/8/21 recertification published by USPTO, green light for N V g to resume trial
*NEW! Court says NLST and google must report publishing within a week
*NEW! inclusion in published patents, "52-91 are determined to be patentable"
https://stocktwits.com/Tomkila/message/285886459
*bought dips as low as .48 keep adding
*yahoo ST Reddit and ihub boards are bullish
some speculation but also good info do your own DD.
*there are active cases with other companies Sk-hynic recently lost
on 2 parts of patent 907
*scheduled markman for infringement of (NLST)patents 218, 525 and 595 3/9/2021
trial, if defendants choose, 12/2021
* SK resently lost to Netlist on appeal for 2 claims 40 & 41 on patent 907
*"Patent 907 found to be patentable against SK Hynix due to 2 claims" which SK Hynix could not justify
*NEW! SK Hynix denied request to change districts. Waco judge says no good reason for you to leave my court. Judge also moved Markman Hearing up to 3/1/21 and trial date up to 7/6/21
OT if I may, another thing I like about the Roth is you can pull out the money you use to fund it before retirement age. Easy breezy.
"I'd rather be holding Netlist stock." I have not read the article but it sounds like poor research. Yeah foolish position.
Holy cow been going up since November! It's a happy camper. Why NAZ, NYSE is a better fit don't you think?
"The ten-million-dollar purchase represents assets in excess of forty million dollars"
Caption at bottom of vid pg:
"The ten-million-dollar purchase represents assets in excess of forty million dollars"
google finance is not the most reliable just good quick look, you know price range and where it trades. SHMP has a youtube site to share news. shrimp in Iowa!
Too funny just searched SHMP and saw Waco TX, WHERE the judge is giving one of NLST's opponents a hard time. So a place near to my heart :) I'm going to check it out.
Yes mt, I have Daylas to thank for his posts.
Nice! Me too only I continued to add.
My pleasure. Hope you loaded.
"patentable" is a confirmation a yes for NLST's case.
I don't think it matters. google challenged the patents. 11 yrs later uspto recertified (google lost) now they pick up where they left off which is half way through the Markman Hearing. The only point of the publishing of the results is it turns on the green light for courts to proceed. Why? Because recertification validates the patent(s) in contention. The validation actually proves infringement.