The more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Defendant needs to reply imo. The judge sets a date to set dates. That’s to the best of my memory, could be missing something.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/dockets.justia.com/docket/texas/txwdce/6:2021cv00430/1131985%3famp
Yes because both parties requested the judge to dismiss.
Case: Netlist, Inc. v. SK hynix America Inc. et al (txwd-6:2020-cv-00525)
Court: Western District of Texas
36. ORDER GRANTING [35] Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright.
N v SK order granting motion to dismiss signed by Albright. Maybe that’s key to releasing the $40mm.
Low volume selling patient buying.
Me either, they are taking care of business, glad to see growing sales.
Like the sequential 30% revenue growth and what they spent money on, the R&D and legal expenses. Will not be selling any shares but will buy if folks want to sell cheap.
Horse to water JJ...Military contracts, licensing fees, new customers in part due to the deal with SK (can't sell what you can't get.)
Because that’s over $10 billion—one and done, bird in hand...
Wonder if this is true? “Citadel Securities would sell short positions to facilitate liquidity on retail trades, and simultaneously bet against retail. Citadel Securities would package those short positions in Collateralized Trust Bonds, and sell those bonds to Citadel Advisors and Melvin Capital.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n7g5gp/citadel_securities_has_over_57500000000_in_open/
That would get the short positions off of Citadel Securities books, effectively "covering" them, and allow them to show FINRA a lower short position holding. They then use their Market Maker status to continue issuing shorts on a stock like GME, causing the price to fall, and the short positions of Melvin and Citadel Advisors to go up in value. It was an infinite money glitch, until retail won a trade.”
Jason G. Sheasby, just thinking about how he might be thinking. One thing we know for sure he very good at what he does.
WELL! That would be the most incredible thing that has ever happened in my life (except giving birth).
I’ve seen drop and pop many times with Nasdaq stocks also draggin’ fly (lol just made that up). That’s when good er then week or so not much then steady climb.
We know expenses have increased, we think revenues have improved. The question is what that will look like and how
will stock react. Whatever that is, I’m betting the trend will be bullish.
I’m loaded for bears just in case.
Well I’ve finally absorbed enough terminology that I get what she is saying so thoroughly I’m feeling like a kid on Christmas morning.
q2 would be soon imo. I’ll be satisfied either q. Thanks for your insights and enthusiasm
Yeah, my sense is that Sk stuff will start percolating in q2.
Yes and they are busy! A working lunch
Yeah history matters here.
Agree!
Hong was upbeat for continued sales in H1 2021 on last q CC. The not so new, new sales manager with industry contacts has a great story to take to them. Looking forward to the updates all around.
Here is a closing argument from a bull. His data and timing is accurate.
“Looks like you don't even know the facts. The reality is Google didn't have their 2 splits yet in 2006 when they stole Netlist's technology. They also were barely above Yahoo's market share at that time. So it is pure FACT that Google became what they are today due to their theft from Netlist. GOOG was about $180 per share and $60B market cap pre-splits in 2006 for your information. Look it up but I doubt you'll bring anymore insight since you don't even know history. Yes by 2009 (3 years later) with the lawsuits, Google had already stolen everything and was worth $250B. (Up 4x from their theft) Of course, just like stealing a F1 car will cause a driver to beat a Honda Civic. lol
There's was zero chance without Netlist Technology that Google would have stayed #1. You can't compete in a race with a horse and buggy. If Google didn't buy more RAM they would be like MySpace....gone. “
what could a bear say? only thing they can do is lie about valuation and dates.
I have bought 2x on the drop under $2.20. To my way of thinking there will come a time when $5 looks cheap....speaks for itself.
Just listen to the shorts an ymb, the knots they have to contort their thinking into.
I doubt this CEO would pick an unqualified etc person. But no doubt some just need practice in front of a camera maybe a little
coaching. My bet is she will get better.
Been weak volume since dropping into this new base under $2.20ish hopefully we can find a higher one.
here we go
Can we expect the new closer to practice in front of Albright?
Awesome! Clearly some knew and were trying to use the lull in trading to pick up some cheap.
Zero conviction = zero personal DD
Chip shortages will continue until 2023, superfoundry TSMC says
The world’s largest chip foundry, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC), has confirmed what you probably already feared: It’s running at maximum capacity, and yet the supply of available chips won’t be easing anytime soon.
In fact, TSMC said during a conference call Thursday local time that the company doesn’t see the supply crunch easing until 2023, according to Bloomberg. “We see the demand continue to be high,” Wei said. “In 2023, I hope we can offer more capacity to support our customers. At that time, we’ll start to see the supply chain tightness release a little bit.”
https://www.pcworld.com/article/3615234/chip-shortages-will-continue-until-2023-superfoundry-tsmc-says.html
Found this link on another board.
It’s a good day to buy!
I hope they make a dent if there were crimes.
Made my day and, I expect, many to come.
“Avenue Of The Stars” (of course)
Ok found the court doc on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/NLST/comments/msbo6w/netlist_vs_google_new_doc/
Here is the whole post, incredible, Hong is extremely serious:
Described in Chambers USA as having “a remarkable ability to come up with creative solutions,” Jason Sheasby focuses on complex litigation, patents, trade secrets, antitrust, regulatory compliance and internal investigations. His experience spans a wide range of industries, including bio/pharmaceuticals, medical devices, semiconductors, telecommunications, electronics, higher education and healthcare.
As an example of the wide diversity of his practice, in a single year, Jason was hired by a client post-trial to successfully reverse the largest patent verdict in history ($2.5 billion in a medicinal chemistry matter) and also obtained a $400 million jury verdict against the largest semiconductor manufacturer in the world.
In another 12-month period, Jason obtained findings of infringement, validity and willfulness in each of three separate jury trials, with verdicts totaling more than $800 million. In the most recent one, he secured a $500 million verdict against Apple for damages over a period of 19 months in the first patent jury trial of the COVID-19 pandemic. The jury also found that Apple was willful and must pay an ongoing royalty. During this same period, Jason obtained a dismissal with prejudice of a multi-count antitrust and unfair competition complaint that accused his client and others of participating in a cartel and group boycott.
While at Harvard Law School, Jason was a research assistant for Professor Arthur Miller and helped to revise Federal Practice & Procedure, the leading treatise on civil procedure.
Jason is repeatedly named in industry awards including the Daily Journal’s “Top 100 Lawyers” and “Top IP Litigators,” The National Law Journal’s “Winning Litigators” list, and Law360’s “Trials MVPs
Sounds like a just the right person also a genius!
I'm here because of the reputations of the CEO and CFO.
Good news!