Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It's crucial to scrutinize actions rather than just words when evaluating any investment strategy or financial advisor, including those at Ark Invest. Here are some points to consider:
In conclusion, when evaluating investment strategies and advisors, it's essential to consider both their stated objectives and their actual actions. An open dialogue and thorough assessment can help investors make informed decisions about their financial future.
Cathy Wood and ARK Invest have gained recognition for their investment philosophy, which focuses on disruptive technology companies and often involves holding these investments for a minimum of 5 years. Here are the key reasons behind their long-term investment thesis and their approach to avoiding short-term "pumping and dumping":
In summary, Cathy Wood and ARK Invest advocate for holding disruptive technology companies for a minimum of 5 years because they believe in the long-term value and growth potential of these innovative firms. Their investment philosophy is grounded in research, a focus on fundamentals, and a commitment to avoiding short-term trading strategies, aligning their interests with the success of the companies in which they invest.
Wood's investment timeline is five years. In her view, that duration maximizes investor returns on these disruptive innovators. In fewer than five years, these stocks can be volatile. Beyond five years, the growth potential slows down.
When projecting a stock's potential over the five-year horizon, Wood looks for a minimum average annual return of 15%.
Why Cathie Wood is Betting Big on Velo3D Stock !
One month away from bankruptcy, Tesla transformed itself into one of the world's most successful companies.
It's crucial to recognize that the current business landscape, aside from the Great Depression, presents one of the most challenging environments for companies. Expanding into the European market during a period of global economic downturn raises questions about feasibility.
Even Tesla, a giant in the industry, is encountering challenges in meeting its performance targets. It's important to approach our evaluation of the company with a balanced perspective that considers the unique circumstances of the present day.
Long-term investors in $VLD are likely to reap rewards. Success often hinges on the ability to perceive opportunities that may elude others.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/03/musk-tesla-was-about-a-month-from-bankruptcy-during-model-3-ramp.html
It is essential to consider the current economic challenges posed by inflation, high interest rates, and Federal Reserve policies, which have placed strain on small-cap companies. Despite these hurdles, $VLD has demonstrated resilience and growth during one of the most challenging economic periods in history.
Anticipated improvements in the macroeconomic environment, including potential decreases in interest rates and reduced geopolitical tensions, are expected to drive substantial gains in the stock price, potentially reaching new record highs.
The company is poised to achieve profitability in the fourth quarter and has hinted at the development of disruptive technology in the CNC machining sector, a potentially transformative development. Additionally, the recent multibillion-dollar defense bill passed by the government will support companies utilizing 3D technology, and $VLD holds the unique distinction of being the only company in the world qualified by NASA.
The impending public offering of Star-Link, with its partnership with SpaceX already utilizing $VLD technology, has the potential to significantly increase demand for $VLD's products. Elon Musk's projection of requiring 9,000 Raptor engines annually by 2025 underscores this demand. To meet these demands, $VLD plans to scale up its production with an increase in machine orders from 32 to 325. Each machine, priced at $6 million, is anticipated to yield a profit margin of 65%.
Considering the CEO's projection of the company generating $30 billion in revenue by 2030, a stock price of $150.00 by 2025 appears conservative.
$150 price target for $VLD by 2030.
"we believe Velo3D has established a substantial competitive edge in the field of metal additive manufacturing, and we expect this to facilitate remarkable growth and greater market recognition."
One TV sitcom character that often left viewers scratching their heads in confusion was Kramer from the show "Seinfeld."
He seemed to exist in his own world, with little regard for societal norms or logical reasoning. His actions and decisions were often random and non-sensical, leaving the other characters, and sometimes the viewers, puzzled.
Your right ! with his account now limited my job is done.
Let's address the claims made in the provided text and apply science, critical thinking, and evidence-based reasoning to debunk each one:
Claim 1: Earth's Magnetic Field Weakening and Increased EM Radiation Exposure
Debunking: The Earth's magnetic field does undergo changes, including periods of weakening and reversals. However, these changes occur over geological time scales (tens of thousands of years) and are not associated with a sudden increase in electromagnetic radiation exposure. The weakening of the magnetic field is a natural process and does not lead to significant health risks from EM radiation.
Claim 2: EMF Increases Corrosion of Metal Implants
Debunking: While some studies suggest that exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) might influence the corrosion of metal implants, it's important to consider the context. Studies on this topic are primarily conducted under controlled laboratory conditions, and the levels of EMFs used may not represent real-world exposure. The impact of EMFs on implant corrosion remains a subject of ongoing research, and the findings are not conclusive.
Claim 3: Metals in the Body Act as Antennas for Harmful Waves
Debunking: The claim that metals in the body act as antennas for harmful waves is misleading. While it's true that metals can interact with electromagnetic waves, the human body is not a significant antenna for harmful radio waves. The levels of radiation emitted by electronic devices like cellphones and Wi-Fi are well below established safety limits and are not known to induce the symptoms described (headaches, fatigue, etc.).
Claim 4: Metal Implants and Disease
Debunking: The link between electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and diseases like Alzheimer's is a complex and contentious area of research. While some studies have explored potential connections, the scientific consensus does not support a direct causal relationship between EMFs and Alzheimer's or other diseases. It's essential to consider various factors, including genetics, lifestyle, and environmental exposures, when studying disease development.
Claim 5: Silicon Nitride Coatings as a Solution
Debunking: While silicon nitride coatings may reduce metal ion release from implants, the idea that replacing all metal implants with silicon nitride will eliminate EM radiation amplification is not supported by scientific evidence. Silicon nitride coatings are primarily intended to address issues related to wear and corrosion of implants, not to prevent EM radiation amplification. Additionally, the complete replacement of metal implants with silicon nitride implants is not a widely adopted practice in the medical field, and further research is needed to assess its safety and efficacy.
Claim 6: Current Issues and Limitations of Other "Biomaterials"
Debunking: The provided link appears to lead to a discussion forum, and the content may not represent scientifically established facts. It's important to rely on peer-reviewed research and expert consensus when evaluating the suitability of biomaterials for medical implants.
In conclusion, while it's essential to consider potential health effects of electromagnetic radiation and the performance of medical implants, many of the claims presented in the provided text lack strong scientific support. It's crucial to base conclusions on well-established scientific research and consult with healthcare professionals for personalized medical advice and implant choices.
"Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data?
Is all this an exercise to create more and more forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?"
ROFLMFAO
It gonna go to tu fifty ! A weeee A weeeee A weeeeee
un yup ! A weeeee A weeeeee tu fiffy cumin next !
It appears that $SINT may be running low on strategies to maintain compliance with the minimum $1.00 stock price requirement. There is a growing concern that the company may face the possibility of bankruptcy or being relegated to the pink sheets, irrespective of any promotional efforts. It is anticipated that there may be another reverse stock split (RS) and subsequent dilution of shares. This cycle has persisted for an extended period of eight years, marked by a recurring pattern of events.
The era of accommodating conspiracy theories from a certain individual has concluded. Thanks to the actions taken by Xfund, along with my own contributions, measures have been implemented to restrict discussions related to Sintx and Tesla that do not align with productive discourse. This includes the elimination of tangential discussions, such as an individual's prolonged fixation on magnetic fields spanning eight years.
We can now redirect our attention to substantive discussions concerning the performance and prospects of these companies' stocks. These efforts were undertaken without any expectation of societal recognition or personal gain. I extend my appreciation to all those who have supported this endeavour, as we aim to eliminate unproductive elements from our discussions and maintain a more focused and constructive dialogue. In the end I won.
The company SINT (AMDA) has been a source of concern for investors due to allegations of dishonest practices, including misrepresentation and misappropriation of investor funds. Despite these allegations, regulatory oversight, notably by the SEC, appears to have allowed these activities to persist over a period of several years.
Moreover, there is a prevailing sentiment among investors that another reverse stock split (RS) may be imminent, potentially leading to further financial losses for those who have placed their trust in the company's assurances.
It is essential to highlight concerns about the company's leadership, particularly Sonny Bal, whose credibility has come under scrutiny in this context. I strongly advise against considering an investment in this company for any reason.
The lingering question remains: why has regulatory action not been taken to address these ongoing issues? It is disconcerting to note that such alleged practices have persisted since 2015.
On a separate note, it is worth acknowledging the positive development of posting limits being instituted here and on the Tesla board. This measure is expected to curtail the proliferation of conspiracy theories and foster more focused discussions on stock-related matters.
MAGNETO STILL DEFENDING SINTX LMAO
Metal Accessories and Radiation:
So, you're telling me that wearing braces, earrings, or having a hip replacement is like turning yourself into a human Wi-Fi antenna? Brilliant! I mean, who needs a cell phone when you can just wear your orthodontics and stream Netflix through your dental work, right?
FCC's Wisdom:
The FCC mentions that electrically conductive objects might interact with RF energy unpredictably. Well, of course! I always thought my eyeglasses were secretly communicating with extraterrestrial beings. Little did I know, my jewelry was hosting a radio talk show.
Enhanced Corrosion:
Ah, yes, the EM radiation-enhanced corrosion of metallic implants. Because, clearly, the next Marvel superhero will be "Radioactive Man," who derives his powers from WiFi signals and uses them to rust iron.
Metal Ions in the Brain:
Metal ions collecting in our organs and brains due to radiation exposure? Well, who needs a tinfoil hat when you can just get a metal hip replacement? Just be prepared for those sudden urges to tap into the Wi-Fi of passing satellites.
Electric Vehicles and Metal Implants:
So, electric vehicles are secretly plotting against our metal implants? Maybe the EVs are trying to assimilate us into their electric hive mind. Resistance is futile!
Evidence from a Trustworthy Source:
Ah, yes, the source you provided, "ehtrust.org." Because nothing says credible scientific evidence like a URL that starts with "eh." It's almost as trustworthy as a site that claims the Earth is flat.
Now, as for your concerns about the stock market and price drops, well, it's a complex world out there. While it might be tempting to blame distractions and conspiracy theories for market fluctuations, the truth is that stock prices are influenced by a myriad of factors, most of which have nothing to do with secret plots to divert attention.
In the grand scheme of things, it's important to approach such claims with a healthy dose of skepticism, apply critical thinking, and seek out reputable sources for information. Remember, sometimes the simplest explanation is the most accurate one, and the financial markets are often driven by a combination of economic indicators, investor sentiment, and global events—not by jewelry and orthodontics.
$SINT Maybe armor facility was just for show, draw new money in, and in typical Sonny fashion fleece them. Wasn't a very large facility to begin with so how much armor could they possibly build anyway, and squandered away a whole year building it with delay after delay because they had no plan managing it themselves. They were not in a hurry; that should have raised a red flag they had no clients harping on them to get production going. Another O2 Today like swindle that was planned by Sonny, devious mutha**er that he is. 1:100RS in December '22. Nine months later here we are. No PRs. No share buying from insiders. SP tanking. Same ol' collaboration BS that goes nowhere. What have you been doing Mr. Balls as CEO?!?!? Why are you even still getting your salary???
$SINT and that’s the real shame. Dude pays himself $600,000 a year for doing nothing but lying. Dude is rarely working in the corporate office. He’s too busy flying around on the company dime. Not to mention the other executives doing the same thing. It’s a great racket. 10 years of broken promises and lies.
I have autonomously addressed the dissemination of conspiracy theories associated with the virus, employing a rigorous approach grounded in sound evidence, scientific principles, and critical analysis. It is evident that Sintx Technologies was consistently misrepresented, being promoted unilaterally by an individual advocating magnetic field conspiracy theories, which bore no substantial connection to the legitimate operations of Sintx or Tesla.
Tech stocks will rally through year-end and beyond despite Fed fears as 'tidal wave' of AI spending drives new bull market, Wedbush says !
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-outlook-tech-rally-fed-wedbush-nvda-msft-ai-2023-9
AI-driven growth will fuel the tech rally into the year's end and beyond, Wedbush Securities Dan Ives said.
The bull run will continue despite uncertainty over the Fed's interest rates and an elevated 10-year Treasury yield.
Tech spending has been stable in the third quarter, laying the groundwork for further gains
$VLD is going to $100.00 by 2025 ! Here is why:
The Profit Margin is 70% percent.
The shares outstanding keep remain steady with no dilution and are now at 197M.
They have 300M in cash and they have zero debt.
The short Interest is decreasing and hedge funds are buying
This is a long term dream stock at these prices. Remember $NVDA went from 0.38 cents to $470.00
This is going to over $10.00 or $15.00 after November 2023 report that will show profitability.
You do not want to miss the opportunity of a lifetime. At a price of 1.65 this the best stock on the market.
Remember we have Elon Musk, Ron Baron, Cathy Wood, SpaceX and Nasa backing us !
A weeee A weeeee A weeeee tu fiffy next stop sukha !
There is only one assertion that attributes value to Sintx Technologies, and it is founded solely on imagination, unfounded theories, and speculative notions. My intention has been to clearly illustrate that an excessive fixation on magnetic fields is not conducive to sound reasoning and lacks relevance in contexts ranging from Tesla to Sintx.
Sintx Technologies a Big PONZI which is allowed to milk Investors for nine years now. Only one person on here pumping conspiracy theories non stop for 4 years that no one cares for ! seen the Tesla board ? can't make this stuff up ! someone is obsessed with innuendos, hidden agendas, conspiracy theories, magnetic fields and solar storms.
SinTX headed to 25 cents as bankruptcy looms !
Top Institutional Holders/ Top Mutual Fund Holders have all sold out and liquidating there positions.
SinTx Delisting imminent ! headed to OTC and penny stock status. game over !
SinTx Bankruptcy on the horizon !!!
Given just how high that expenditure is, relative to the company's market value, we think there's an elevated risk of Bankruptcy and we would be very nervous about holding the stock.
Based on the latest financial disclosure, Sintx Technologies has a Probability Of Bankruptcy of 87%. This is much higher than that of the sector and significantly higher than that of the Probability Of Bankruptcy industry
SinTX headed to 25 cents as bankruptcy looms !
Top Institutional Holders/ Top Mutual Fund Holders have all sold out and liquidating there positions.
SinTx Delisting imminent ! headed to OTC and penny stock status. game over !
SinTx Bankruptcy on the horizon !!!
Given just how high that expenditure is, relative to the company's market value, we think there's an elevated risk of Bankruptcy and we would be very nervous about holding the stock.
Based on the latest financial disclosure, Sintx Technologies has a Probability Of Bankruptcy of 87%. This is much higher than that of the sector and significantly higher than that of the Probability Of Bankruptcy industry
$VLD will go up fiffy points in wun year that is a 50X Tesla is a turd will taje tu fifty years and is ova valued u understand.
$VLD fair value is $28.00 USD per share now !
$VLD is going to $100.00 by 2025 ! Here is why:
The Profit Margin is 70% percent.
The shares outstanding keep remain steady with no dilution and are now at 197M.
They have 300M in cash and they have zero debt.
The short Interest is decreasing and hedge funds are buying
This is a long term dream stock at these prices. Remember $NVDA went from 0.38 cents to $470.00
This is going to over $10.00 or $15.00 after November 2023 report that will show profitability.
You do not want to miss the opportunity of a lifetime. At a price of 1.65 this the best stock on the market.
Remember we have Elon Musk, Ron Baron, Cathy Wood, SpaceX and Nasa backing us !
I believe you got your wiener schnitzel stuck up your lederhosen again ! $VLD long term is a $500.00 stock ! no one cares for day to day non sense.. Weeeeee A weeeeee Aweeeeeee a weeeeeeee
Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data?
Is all this an exercise to create more and more forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?
yes yes and yup ! A weeeeeeee A weeeeeeeeeee
$VLD fair value $28.00 USD per share now !
Aweeeeee Aweeeeee Aweeeeee tu fiffy coming then tu tu fiffy ! Aweeeeee Aweeeeee Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Aweeee Aweeee Aweeee tu fiffy cuming next ! A weeee A weeeeeeeeee
Chemicals in the water are turning people gay
One of Jones’ most notorious conspiracy theories is that the government is using chemicals in order to turn people gay, using a mysterious “gay bomb” devised by the Pentagon.
“The reason there’s so many gay people now is because it’s a chemical warfare operation, and I have the government documents where they said they’re going to encourage homosexuality with chemicals so that people don’t have children,” he said on his broadcast in 2010, according to NBC News.
Five years later, the theory took a turn. In a rant that has since become a meme and a line of t-shirts, Jones said he didn’t like the government “putting chemicals in the water that turn the friggin’ frogs gay.”
“The majority of frogs in most areas of the United States are now gay,” Jones said in 2017. The claim was without evidence.
In 1994, a government lab did request funds to pursue the development of a weapon that would turn enemy combatants gay, though the project was quickly shelved and no such weapon was developed. A 2013 report in Gizmodo notes that the same lab also requested funding for “bad-breath bombs, flatulence bombs and bombs designed to attract swarms of stinging insects to enemy combatants,” noting that “the gay bomb is certainly the most novel.”
Accident rate for Tesla 80% lower than US average with FSD
Electric vehicle giant Tesla says its accident rate with Autopilot engaged is just a fraction of the industry average in the US.
New data released in its Impact Report show that Tesla vehicles with Autopilot engaged (mostly highway miles) had just 0.18 accidents per million miles driven, compared to the US vehicle average of 1.53 accidents per million miles.
Teslas on non-highways with Full Self Driving (FSD) engaged had just 0.31 accidents per million miles representing an 80% reduction in accidents compared with the average vehicle. Tesla vehicles with no active safety triggered – neither Autopilot of FSD – had an accident rate of 0.68, less than half the total US vehicle fleet.
The company also illustrated how automatic emergency braking using Tesla Vision identifies pedestrians and their direction of travel.
The vehicle’s AI software will then make a split second decision to assess the surroundings and apply emergency braking while turning away from the pedestrian.
Nighttime safety
According to the impact report in 2021 US pedestrian and road-user fatalities reached their highest level ever, a 53% increase since 2012, with over 75% of those happening at night.
Tesla says all of its models received a Euro NCAP five-star rating including for nighttime pedestrian and crash avoidance.
Tesla says it collects enormous amounts of data from real-world and simulated crashes which help it to develop the structure of the vehicle as well as its collision avoidance software.
“Whether simulated or real, we can learn from any crash to help optimise the protection of the occupants and reduce the likelihood of injury,” says Tesla in the report.
“As all of our vehicles are connected, we can further leverage this philosophy by deploying new safety capabilities and improvements over-the-air as software updates.”
Crash data is so detailed that Tesla can generate heatmaps showing the precise point and size of impacts
Injury studies
Tesla also uses detailed data on injuries to develop its seatbealts and airbag system.
“We leverage our ever-growing data set to help ensure occupants receive the best possible restraints (such as seatbelts and airbags) for the impact they are involved in, and design innovative restraint systems for the future,” says Tesla in the report.
“Our safety analysis engineers evaluate through simulation studies to enhance our understanding of the complex impacts that occur in the field.”
The passenger facing camera inside the car as well as weight sensors in the seats determine the passengers’ size, weight and position and synchronise the firing of various airbags to optimise the the system in real time during a crash.
Tesla says that as its crash data grows with its growing fleet the system will continue to improve even further.
“The study of injuries has been accelerated by the creation of automated data pipelines and by leveraging machine learning to analyse large data sets. As the capability of driver assistance advances, the nature of the crash exposure to our fleet will change.”
Electric vehicles will save the world
EVs help the environment because they produce much less air and climate pollution than vehicles that run on gasoline. This is true even though much of our electric grid is still powered by fossil fuels.
As our electric grid gets cleaner, with more renewable energy coming online, electric vehicles will get even cleaner too.
A gas vehicle will keep polluting as long as you drive it.
Concerns about mining the minerals we need for EV batteries are real, and they need to be addressed. (Drilling for oil, of course, has its own environmental downsides.) The upside for EVs is still tremendous — a medium-sized EV produces 60-68% fewer greenhouse gas emissions over its lifetime than a gas-powered car.
How far can an electric car drive on one charge?
— Diana McCall, Tampa, FL
These days, a new EV can get anywhere from 100 miles to more than 400 miles on a single charge, depending on the make and model.
Among model year 2023 EVs, at least 35 get more than 300 miles on a charge and seven top out at over 400 miles. Many of the most affordable EVs get more than 250 miles on a charge.
To find out a vehicle’s range, check out the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s official estimate. Just remember: as with EPA gas mileage estimates, performance may vary.
Are electric car prices going down?
— Caroline Bailey, Brooklyn, NY
EV prices have dropped considerably over the last several years, and evidence suggests that prices will continue to go down. In fact, in February alone, the average price of an EV dropped by more than $1,000.
Nowadays, the sticker price for at least three EVs is less than $30,000 and 10 models sell for less than the average cost of a new non-luxury car — $44,700. Plus, there are a host of federal, state and local incentives and rebates that can cut the cost of an EV by thousands of dollars. The full federal tax credit alone is up to $7,500, depending on the model and whether you buy or lease. This online resource from Consumer Reports can help you learn more.
How much does the cost of charging an electric car compare to the cost of gas?
— Vivian, Brooklyn, NY
Simply put, electricity is almost always cheaper than gasoline. In fact, one of the great selling points for EVs is that fueling them generally costs significantly less, even in areas where electricity prices are high. This calculator from the U.S. Department of Energy can help you understand the basics and compare fuel costs, vehicle to vehicle.
And be on the lookout for utility and other incentives that can reduce the cost of charging even further. Many utilities have lower rates for charging during non-peak hours.
Are electric vehicle batteries recyclable?
— Ian Mirthes, New Jersey
Good news here: There are impressive options for reusing and recycling EV batteries. Already, some companies are using spent EV batteries that can still hold some charge to store electricity generated by solar panels.
Likewise, as much as 95% of an EV battery can be recycled — making the critical minerals they contain ready for use in batteries again. There are some challenges involved. EV batteries aren’t as easy to recycle as, say, an aluminum can. And the price of recycled battery minerals is still high. But a number of companies across the U.S. are ramping up battery recycling plants — another way that the EV industry is creating domestic jobs.
Jacob Helberg interview on CNBC today. Apparently serious people are seeing indications of China preparing for a hot war with the West. One interesting point he made was the change that is absolutely necessary for defense manufacturers. Taking months and years to adapt or introduce changes to manufacturing must be done much faster. VLD will be key to doing, they are in the sweet spot of what’s going to be in demand. The amount of change coming in a variety of business segments in the next ten years will surpass the roaring 1920’s.
Science Reveals The Face Of God And It Looks Like Elon Musk !
Once you see them side by side, the resemblance is so obvious. Put an aggregated vision of what God looks like next to a head shot of Elon Musk and prepare to be freaked out.
A study that surveyed 511 American Christians yielded a composite image of what the participants believe God looks like. I stared at this face for a while, thinking it looked familiar, like my uncle in his 30s, maybe? Then I saw that Gizmodo had picked up on the Musk-like similarities and couldn't imagine seeing anyone else in that face.
Psychologists from the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill asked believers to look at hundreds of randomly differing face pairs and pick one from each pair that looked most like how they imagine God. All the selections were then combined into the composite face of the being that created heavens and earth... or is it the man who wants to moves us from earth deeper into the heavens?
Interestingly, a "face of God" that looks like Elon Musk means that we seem to think the Creator is a very modern man; clean-shaven and rather youthful looking, unlike the classic images of an old dude with a big beard in the clouds.
The study found that people saw a lot of themselves in God. Younger people believed in a younger-looking God, African Americans believed in a deity that looked more African American, and people who consider themselves more physically attractive believe in a God who is more hot than not.
This may help explain why the study's collective God looks like Elon Musk, who undeniably looks like a pretty average white person. I have to wonder: if we created a composite image of the 511 people that participated in the study, would we get roughly the same face?
AA weeeee AA weeeee AAweeeee tu fiffy coming den tu tu fiffy by 20 turty !!! AA weeeeee AA weeeeeee AA weeeeeeeeee