Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
OT........Just read the post from serafino
How dare YOU post about COOP on the COOP board...the nerve!!!!! SMH
Can't make this shxt up.................
OT....actually that makes no sense.
If what you stated is true there should be a Date 8 which covers March 2018 to March 2021.....THERE IS NONE!!!
The IRS is referring to their initial PLR request which occurred in the timeframe for the 2021 extension.
So the IRS listed every major date but left out the extension request in 2018 so the LT could run until 2021?...really???
Where is the reference for the 2018 extension to 2021???
If there is no Date 8 your claim is wrong!
As for the PLR, yes it appears to clearly be regarding the WMILT.
THE WMILT IS DONE. Date 6 was simply the date the Bankruptcy Court granted the motion for the 2nd extension of the WMILT, ie March 2015 - March 2018. It was not an additional extension thus Date 7 runs to March 19 2021. Game Over!!!
Btw...the FDIC has NOTHING to do with any legacy bankruptcy assets that may exist so the excuse that the Receivership, ie, the only thing the FDIC controls, needs to be closed for distributions to be made is pure rubbish. If there were any Safe Harbor assets left there is nothing stopping them from being distributed right now. The reason they aren't is because they DO NOT EXIST!!! Just more grasping at straws by "corns".
The information submitted states that on Date 1 Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court.... D1 - September 2008
On Date 2, Plan was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court and became effective Date 3....D2 - February 2012 AND D3 - March 2012
The initial term of Trust was for three years ending Date 4, but could be extended by request to the Bankruptcy Court for successive fixed terms not to exceed three years....D4 - March 2015
The initial term of the Trust expired before the Liquidating Trustee completed its duties under the Plan and trust agreement.
On motion to the Bankruptcy Court, Liquidating Trustee requested an extension of the Trust term to Date 5, nunc pro tunc to Date 4, arguing the extension was necessary to implement the Plan and the trust agreement....D5 - March 2018
On Date 6, the Bankruptcy Court granted the Liquidating Trustee’s motion....D6 - After March 2015
Simultaneously with submitting its request for this ruling, Liquidating Trustee has made an additional request to the Bankruptcy Court for an extension of the Trust term until Date 7....March 2021
Anything is possible IMO but a sharp increase in the amount of Trial sites would have been a subtle confirmation that the Trials were progressing well. Any changes to the size and scope of the Trial would have had to come directly from the DSMB since that body has the sole authority to alter/adjust how a Trial is conducted. Common sense tells me that they, the DSMB, would not drastically enlarge a study that was failing.
Note: As I've stated on several occasions, the ""silence"" from RVV on these Trials is telling when contrasted with other companies conducting similar Trials.
The push for people to get vaccinated has not peaked just yet IMO....so we wait for the authorities to shift their focus to Therapeutics.
We'll see soon enough!!!
What's your take as to the possible actions COOP may take to maximize the NOL benefit, especially with this growing impetus to increase corporate taxes by the current Admin?
More concisely, will there be a need for COOP to realign it's Share Structure to, or close to the levels at emergence in 2012???
NOTE: I am not referring to any goofy S4V/WMI-COOP legacy assets theory as promoted here daily by the "usual" crew. It's strictly based upon the proposed tax increases and how COOP could mitigate any such action.
Was expecting to see between 5-10 new sites added.
Surprised that none apparently were....oh well!
Take a wild guess who makes the drugs cited, ie, are they fledgling startup companies, or established Pharmaceuticals/companies backed by them???
Once you arrive at the answer it will become much clearer why these ""articles"" get released and why Buc gets ZERO recognition that's not based solely on the NDA.
Btw, research their side effects....that aspect of these "Potential New Treatments" always curiously gets ignored by the authors.
Waiting for an update on ClinicalTrials re how many additional sites were added, IF ANY...that info will be very telling at this stage IMO.
Your Quote: "?? is a string along artist"
One of many here that continue to misinterpret the FACTS so that it fits the Escrow Billions narrative.
At this point it's like a long running Comedy series, (Cheers) but not nearly as funny and getting less entertaining by the day.
The fact is, we got screwed back in 2008 when the FDIC gifted WMB assets to JPM.
So, reposting the same public info 10,000 different ways, or new ""experts""/aliases appearing, is going to change that.
It will all be over soon and am looking forward to reading about the next wave of dates and excuses.
While the ""investigation"" by Levy will almost surely amount to nothing, it will undoubtedly cast somewhat of a shadow over COOP because of the coverage...good thing for us is that it's irrelevant to those that actually drive the pps.
Not sure what P/Z's endgame is yet but I'm sensing desperation is setting after all the previous Escrow failures, hence the concerted effort now to convince shareholders to join yet another pointless lawsuit.
After each failed pay date it's becoming clear that more and more posters are finally seeing through this now 9 year charade...GOOD RIDDANCE!!!
COOP TARGET: $45
Noticing a sudden impetus to start fresh litigation in this case by several people here.
Now this latest attempt by an alias created TODAY to call some law firm.
Looks like a new version of the AG nonsense by people with an agenda!
SCAM V2.0....in any event it's your money being wasted soooo by all means, have at it!!! LOLOL
Not going to happen until the promotion of vaccines is no longer effective.
Most healthy people if given the option of using a Therapeutic that lessens the effect of the virus (especially long used drugs like Bucillamine), OR, quickly formulated novel vaccines, whose long term effects are still unknown, will IMO overwhelmingly choose the former.
This is what happens when Politics is "injected" into Science....it's along the same lines as much of the "MAN MADE" Climate Change baloney.
Do you even know what plagiarism means?
"corn" is short for Unicorn, not your "CON" line.....plank! LOLOL
Stick to peddling AG BS and dreaming of getting your appeal fund$ back.
NUT.............
Don't be surprised if 2041 arrives and that one fails too...just wait a few days for the next "corn" theory and pay date. LOL
Can't believe it took me till 2019 to see through this BS....to bad so many are still immersed in it and sinking slowly!
Will be happy with a simple update of our status on ClinicalTrials about how many additional sites were added, if any.
If the Trial Data being viewed by the DSMB showed Buc was ineffective common sense tells me that they would not be scaling up the study .
If we find out that many new sites were indeed added, in addition to the relative silence by RVV, it would indicate that something big is brewing IMO.
I don't believe RVV, a company with no recurring revenue streams to date, would be willing to throw $25M behind research that's failing.
They do have many promising Psych based projects where that money could be put to much better use after all.
Lets hope it's all a head-fake....while everyone's attention is on those 3 companies, Mol, Fluvox and all the others getting hyped in the MSM, RVV drops a Covid PR NUKE out of nowhere!!!
Time will tell............
Totally agree.
CY#N, RL#@F and H%EN are all tripping over themselves to put out glossy PR's about their SUPPOSED Covid Trial successes...the catch is in the details!
If RVV's Trial fails so be it, but as you said...would prefer to get an accurate picture rather than a sensationalized one.
Soldiers get vaccinated against diseases that are actually deadly...not for a flu virus that has killed less than 0.1% of the population WORLDWIDE....it's called math, you should try it sometime.
Those who are at risk should get vaccinated IF THEY SO CHOOSE but don't tell me that I must get vaccinated even though Covid poses little to zero risk to the vast majority.
Yet another $$ grab....panic the population using the media to sell this BS so the owners of said Media companies can cash in on their stock/ownership in Pharmaceutical companies...nice scam isn't it.
Thanks, but no thanks...USEFUL IDIOTS!!!
And your point is what exactly???
Not interested in deciphering whatever message you're trying to put across.
Just wait till they 25th Ol Joe and install KH....SMH!!!
""Vaccine Passports""....here they come!!!
Was always the end game......
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/desantis-vows-to-take-executive-action-against-vaccine-passports/ar-BB1f60Ks?ocid=msedgdhp
OT.....great news!
re the stock purchase from KKR.
One Post limit on the Psych Ward
The so called DD here has gone from being about providing valid info to Escrow holders to that of seeking kudos and praise for literally getting NOTHING right, ie BB, LaGr, new, PP <--> Zee etc etc.
On another note, there is a mental block concerning the UW's, hence the ridiculously repeated nonsense about "Prefs not being capped"....blah blah blah!
THE TRUST IS DONE BECAUSE AG LOST AGAIN....4 TIMES IN A ROW!!!
ZERO EVIDENCE OF ASSETS OR ANYTHING OF NOTE COMING BACK.
CRYSTAL CLEAR THAT F&R WAS EQUITY'S FULL OWNERSHIP OF NEWCO.
GET OVER IT!!!
Merck called in a "favor" with Bloomberg to get that puff piece written.
RVV doesn't have that luxury.
Read, Rationalize and Research everything posted whether you agree with it or not!!!
The Pumpers and Bashers are on the sidelines waiting to hop aboard this Train when it starts to build momentum.
Btw, looks like we are in the midst of "Walkdown Part Deux"...we might even test lower than the ~26 we saw the last time.
Wonder if MF and/or other management will use it as an opportunity to load up!?!
Pretty clear the two statements below are not the same. Also, lets wait until they post an update on clinicaltrials before making determinations. The last one was made on Feb 24th, 2021 and I'm pretty confident that when they do it will be revealed that additional sites were added. MF may not be releasing all the info he has, for whatever reason, but I absolutely DO NOT believe we are being misled about the addition of sites!
"the Company plans to aggressively expand from 14 clinical sites to up to 50 clinical sites"
VS
"The Company currently has partnered with 14 clinical sites in six states including California, Florida, Illinois, Nevada, North Carolina and Texas and is now expanding to up to 50 clinical sites within the current states"
I don't think they need to expand to 50 sites in multiple states to get to 1000 patients.
The same could have been achieved in 2-3 states that still have a high number of infections at a much reduced cost.
In any event all these decisions were made by the DSMB since they are the only ones with access to the data and makes decisions re whether the Trial is to be halted or continued/expanded.
Unless the entire DSMB is corrupt I think we can draw positive conclusions from their recommendations.
Quote: "The Study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and the safety and efficacy data at each interim analysis timepoint at 210, 400, 600 and 800 completed patients are only made available to the DSMB for review and recommendations on continuation, stopping or changes to the conduct of the Study."
It's simply semantics....The DTC created and maintains our Cusips.
The WMILT simply ISSUED ie distributed them to those who released.
Someone here recently posted a response from KCC that pretty much said the same thing.
Quote: "The Company currently has partnered with 14 clinical sites in six states including California, Florida, Illinois, Nevada, North Carolina and Texas and is now expanding to up to 50 clinical sites within the current states and in COVID-19 hot spot states such as Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina. The Company is on track to meet its planned enrollment goal for the Study in Q2-2021."
Most telling, and likely overlooked, part of the PR IMO.
Tells me that they have gotten the "all clear" from the DSMB to drastically expand the Trial based on the promising results/data collected so far.
From the language in the PR, it seems that process is well underway.
As I posted previously, no company expends $25M on a Trial that's failing, or they know is going to fail!!!
All my OPINIONS are obviously predicated on the fact that we are not being misled by RVVTF management in any way.
Seems Psychs, based on the symptoms, could be a possible treatment option for Covid "Long Haulers".
Agreed. We won't move without sustained buying pressure the likes of which we saw for one day a couple weeks ago.
I admit it,...................
I'm an A-HOLE....but that's too crazy, even for me! LOL
Question: "Thinking of selling I bought in at .29 and rode the wave to .72 and got greedy. Don’t see the upside to sticking around. Can anyone convince me to stay?"
Response: "MOVE ALONG....NOBODY IS BUYING YOUR BS!!!"
Question asked...question answered.
Now, with that issue resolved...are you slow???
Perfect illustration of what's going on now. LOLOL
new BO La have to keep moving the dates to keep pretending to be relevant.
Everyone knows by now their ""DD"" is steaming garbage.
Is he even a ""Doctor"" or is that title meaningless?
A real prize CYDN has there....LOLOL
Those who bash CYDN, for whatever reason, do raise some legitimate points, BUT, they also do seem to have serious animus for NP/CYDN, hence their constant attacks and criticism...justified or not.
On the flipside, the irrational responses and defence of what appears to be misinformation, at best, or malfeasance on the part of NP/CYDN re Trial data and other issues is ""amazing"".
Note: Neither Pro or Con....been following CYDN since 2020 with the hope of getting a great flipping opp from it's Covid news.
Reading the responses here with amazement....it's like a CYDN Cult!
Spumoni.............Friday, 03/05/21 05:11:24 PM
Re: None
Post #24881 of 25302
Quote : "Is this company for real or are we getting scammed? As you could imagine I hate losing money"
MOVE ALONG....NOBODY IS BUYING YOUR BS!!!
RELEASED SHARES are what matters?....REALLY???
So say I received 100K of these RELEASED SHARES in 2012 for my WMI Equity, but later sold it all.
If 50, 100, 200 etc persons ended up buying my shares, since one entity buying the entire 100K is unlikely, all of them now owns my interests in any SH Assets???
Now if those 50, 100, 200 original buyers sold, and the new buyers sold, and the subsequent buyers sold....you get the picture, how exactly does that mess get sorted out?
There are a lot of theories here that are "way out there", but this one ranks among the highest on that scale.
The only thing that matters IF the SH Assets theory is true, I DON"T THINK IT IS, are our Markers, NOT Newco shares!
Good grief!!!!
Left side of page right under the "2.64M Total Volume and 1.58M CSE Vol" info.
Just click where it says SEDI Insider Filings.