Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
tedro84 what exactly are you accusing Niocorp of doing to you? I see LCP and T&T are all lathered up about this supposed terrible behavior, but what exactly are you claiming?
So far I see a bunch of he said she said stuff between you and Walter (yawn).
Then there's the meeting request from Scott that apparently never happened. If Scott didn't "follow through" like you claimed, wouldn't one deduct that he's not quite as worried about silencing you as you think he is?
Then there's the Linkedin searches screenshot. This proves nothing, unfortunately. You do realize that one does not have to search for your name to show up in a LinkedIn search right? It's more so based on your industry, title, connections, etc.
Maybe there's something here, but the proof you've posted (and the other Niocorp detractors lapping it up) is laughable.
That's basically what you already said :)
I was looking for specifics that would help me know whether this scenario was 1) real and 2) has any correlation with this project besides the presence of Yorkville in some capacity.
I'm not crazy about Yorkville's involvement either. Asking honestly.
ALDRAD care to be more specific on that situation?
Show your math on this one?
Probably shouldn't be surprised that NIOBF is trading right around the $.89 mark right now. I doubt it's just a coincidence.
The best part of the cbs channel video was the comments from the reporter and the anchor at the end.
"This is just incredible"
"It's amazing this is not just fast-tracked at this point."
This was moments after Mark, said "we've been preaching this for years without an audience... (now) we have an audience."
I can't help but think that the larger the "audience" is, the more people are going to have the same response as the reporter & anchors in the video...
https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/video/niocorp-developments-receives-interest-from-the-export-import-bank-of-the-us/?fbclid=IwAR2lLiLxAqtR30-sNRfYDOcbfesMbnS59XA1uV4rjB5ew3PYdCFJfx0zAik#x
Looks like $10.1054 as of December 31 according to this 8K: https://www.benzinga.com/secfilings/23/03/31116915/gx-acquisition-corp-ii-form425
You can't withhold material news, but can you strategically delay it?
For example, I think the team is pretty confident where the REE feasibility is going to end up. But technically, they have to cross the t's and dot the i's before they can officially announce anything.
So is it possible to slow play or be "extra thorough" in crossing those t's and dotting the i's in order to dictate when the final conclusion is cemented and must be immediately made public?
The piece of paper on top says "President Trump's Coronavirus Guidelines For America," so I don't think that pile of books has been touched in a long while.
(Mods that's actually what it says no need to delete)
I received an email from TD Ameritrade this morning with voting instructions and a direct link. Couldn't have been easier. Subject line of the email said: "Vote now! NIOCORP DEVELOPMENTS LTD. Special Meeting"
About on par with your comparison to Solyndra and better than your comparison to "100's" of yet to be named companies that you keep referencing as examples of where Niocorp is headed.
Is your contention that investing in Niocorp is OK if you trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange but too risky if you trade OTC in the US?
Are we talking about a company or a particular ticker symbol?
Is your contention that investing in Niocorp is OK if you trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange but too risky if you trade OTC in the US?
I like your thought process... a question:
I think it's possible to be more specific.
Care to be more specific?
Well yes, if you go to NioCorp's website they used a more favorable headline to showcase the article, but everything I see that is actually put out by the NYT still reads the headline about Nebraskans sitting on strategic metals and questioning whether mining is a patriotic duty.
https://www.nytimes.com/section/todayspaper
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/02/climate/nebraska-mine-niobium-rare-earths.html
Unless I'm missing something. I think they sometimes have different headlines in different areas.
What I see still reads: "Nebraskans Are Sitting on Strategic Metals. Is Mining a Patriotic Duty?"
https://www.nytimes.com/section/todayspaper
As others have pointed out, investors buying into GXII in order to have a future stake in NIOBF is the most logical conclusion.
Even if we heard this directly from the investor/institution's mouth, I get the feeling you would claim we still can't know for sure because their true motives might be hidden.
You keep on clinging to this point, but do you have an alternative theory as to why someone would be buying GXII at this point in time if they weren't interested in owning Niocorp?
While you're at it, how about some verifiable proof this is a pump & dump, as you have claimed several times?
Clarification on Warrants & R/S:
You mentioned I was right with my assumptions, but I'm still fuzzy on the R/S impact on both number of warrants and the strike price. Example Scenario:
Let's say I have 100 GXII Warrants which are good for 1118.292 NIOBF shares at $1.028 strike price.
Let's say there is a 10/1 Reverse Split for simplicity sake.
Does that 10/1 split apply to the outstanding warrants? Would I still own 100 warrants or now only 10 post split?
Or does the 10/1 split apply to the strike price? Would it still be $1.028 or is it now $10.28 (1.028*10)?
Question about GXII warrants related to reverse split:
I first became aware of Niocorp and started investing some funds in August of this year and have been following the board closely over the past couple months. I greatly appreciate all the insight shared here from all, but I'm unclear on an element of GXII warrant conversion, but I'm hoping someone can help.
Let's say I have 100 GXII warrants. My understanding is this provides me the right to purchase 1118.292 NIOBF shares (or 100 * 11.18292) @ $1.028 per share, correct?
Assuming a Reverse Split occurs, what impact does this have on the 100 warrants and/or the strike price? Would these warrants be subject to the same split ratio? Would the strike price increase proportionally?
Thanks in advance to anyone that might point me in the right direction!