Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
flipper,
If NWBO is in Roling Review with the MHRA and the MHRA has in that process questions, would that not be a good reason why it takes this long? The moment the last page is then submitted without any questions left for the MHRA is when the MAA is officially submitted. Of course, after that, it would take only very little time for approval as Senti suggests.
This is what I think what is going on
same here. Last two weeks I already bought a boatload of shares and now Im almost out of investment powder. I will sell 150k shares as soon as we see $1.2 again. The rest I will probably sell after FDA approval.
Once NWBO announces either a plan for submitting to the RA's, or that they actually have submitted for approval, everything turns around. That will be the day that we finally see Sojo's "GUANLP" event. Price will immediately turn around and start heading to a realistic valuation.
and who from the senior citizen's management members will then for the coming decade in their 75+ prime lead NWBO into the future? Boynton 78y or Jasinowski 84? And as chairperson Powers 67?
No way
Also, big pharma hardly almost never enters in the construction you described
I highly doubt that any of the partnerships will include much equity. I am convinced it will be a revenue sharing with a hefty upfront payment and maybe, but only maybe a small equity stake in the future. Hence, the SP will have very little meaning in terms of the partnership arrangement(s).
Lol so we are now getting to the quantum mechanics part of the MAA submission
And reason for the delay is according to thermo
The filings have to be prefect and, sometimes, getting the last 1% right takes an inordinate amount of time...so it could even be June.
well it does say PLANS in 2023. So I hate to say it but I do think Hoff has a point here
I believe Thermo was referencing the MIA when commented that approval was coming soon, and not marketing approvals. That said, I do think the approval process will move more quickly than some posters may think.
thats because every step they take in the process is new to them and thus impossible to estimate any timeline. If we had experienced biotech management then this is something that would not happen. You should know that by now. Im angered by it as well but I already (a half years ago) decided to accept it.
well you and LS were right its going to be June...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171674950
Ok thank you, Thermo. From all of our experience, we know that timelines do change at NWBO HQ.
There are other initiatives that I think are interesting, but I'd like to see those develop further before I make them a material part of my assessment.
I don’t know why they would PR simply filing an initial set of documents not yet confirmed as filed.
its mind-boggling that on one hand LS asserts that LP has created enormous Shareholder Value bc of MIA Approval for Advent then pretends to not understand why this shareholders value is not being reflected in NWBO's market cap and then, on the other hand, conveniently refuses to mention that Advent Bio Ltd is NOT an NWBO subsidiary which it should have been. As if Larry Smith does not understand to gain market value from a certain asset one should actually own it, as if the market is dumb.
Perhaps LS meant that NWBO should gain value now that it no longer has to pay for the founding of Advent ?
I am a realist
it can logically be reasoned it will take several more months
Nope, wrong. Absolutely not
Smith on Stocks article was meant to temper expectations. This isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
Um, I assume I don't have to provide a link to the SOS article that you yourself reference.
SOS certainly is a mouthpiece for the company,
Therefore, yes, management has started grooming investors via their social media/message board outlets that marketing apps will not be occurring as fast as investors believe.
And to be sure, I hope that you/your source is correct about April MAA. I'm certainly not saying you are lying.
I really do believe they are very close.
His favorite excuse come early to mid May will be - “everything takes longer with NWBO!”
Thermo said April showers or May flowers. The number of pages has not changed since he said that two weeks ago. His April timeline coincides with one million pages.
ha I bet that there are some good NWBO shareholder lawyers staying in your bench park who can help you with that for a donut and a bottle of bottle of kool-aid, which she btw has to reimburse you for!
No shock here that management has started grooming investors via their social media/message board outlets that MAA will be taking longer than anyone expected or wants.
It is wild that NWBO just refuses to come out and say their plans.
would a divorce at this point not work best for the two of you? She can keep the TV + audio you the NWBO shares :)
the last time LS predicted a timeline for MAA submission was in Sept 2022. He then predicted MAA would be submitted in Q1 2023. So he is just not well informed in timelines.
if in fact this will take another two months.
Management has given no guidance on when it will file the MAA. As an out and out guess, I am estimating a filing by early June or possibly sooner. I have no meaningful information underlying this guess. It just stems from an appreciation of how complex the process is and how methodical NWBO has been in other document preparations.
I continue to believe they are waiting on ph 2 combo trial results to come out before applying to FDA
thank you for your perspective. Based on your analysis I will be buying another 20K NWBO shares coming week. I already bought 30k last week.
are you sure about that
https://remapconsulting.com/gene-therapy-atmps/access-outcomes-novel-approaches/
The uncertainty associated with cell and gene therapies can be managed through adopting novel approaches to pricing and reimbursement. The entry of Kymriah and Yescarta into the EU4 and UK markets highlights how real-world evidence (RWE) is becoming a powerful tool to demonstrate the value of cell and gene therapies in a clinical setting.
Conclusion
Cell and gene therapies launched in Europe to date have had varied pricing and reimbursement success. The clinical uncertainty resulting from limited data packages can make securing commercially viable outcomes for manufacturers a challenge. To support patient access to the important benefit these treatments can achieve, work should continue on implementing novel reimbursement approaches that recognise the unique value of cell and gene therapies. The experience of recent launches to the European landscape suggests that the potential for outcomes-based reimbursement and coverage with evidence development schemes as an opportunity to demonstrate the real-world value of these therapies should be explored further.
Alton was dumping imo. Not waiting LP.
Yes DCVAXL will be approved before 2037 even before 2078
well Im not sure if MAA was ready 100% at the time MIA was granted. They probably had to include some details/info about the MIA certificate that they didn't know prior to the date MIA was provided. But yes it would be absurd beyond nuts if the MAA has not been submitted yet by now.
Senti seems to believe there won’t be simultaneous approvals, but believes they’ll be timed in a fairly close stagger.
If you mean with the company NWBO
What percentage of the company received MIA
but did not receive MAA?
And that’s bad? Hopefully we’ll see some public good faith exhibited after MAA acceptance. The most recent SOW really seems to have duties set until MAA submission. So…
I found the most relevant statement from Merck to be that they are pursuing “derisked assets.”
Now that was interesting as the author does not seem to buy the idea that the FDA etc. demanded NWBO have a crossover because otherwise he would be pretty foolish to criticize the trial for including a crossover when there was no choice.
Looks like it. They want you out before NYAS. The only definite date on the calendar so far.
My take is that its very difficult for a few MDs to comprehend that DCVAXL amended the SAP to RWE OS. AS AF did, they keep rehashing the trial failed because it did not meet its original PFS endpoint. I do believe the small doubt that has been sawn after JA has partially contributed to larger investment parties waiting before investing. That's why I strongly believe we see a huge increase in market cap after MHRA approval. Not because the UK is a such dominant market but because it will prove the well-respected MHRA fully accepts the amended SAP which I think will give the green light for larger investors to start buying NWBO shares.
This may be a coordinated (mini?) short attack again yes, would not surprise me.