Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm sure that you have adopted more of them or have you retired from rat raising? I did write a book where they were prominent but not exactly as pets.
oops sorry about that. I know you love your animals
Hiya DD. I wonder if this might mean that BKMP shareholders can get back into the lawsuit given that Sandy appears to be busy and will be for a while. At least one question could be answered and that is Is Sanjai really Sandy? I'm sure you wont get a reply from him if Sandy did indeed make him up.
Hiya Janice. I see your rat's got a buddy. Is that a Chinchilla?
Some reading material for you Neal
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/April2011/07/c2415.html
I'm running out as well. Me....I'm still writing my books (On #10). I really enjoyed talking to ya DD as always. Keep up the good work. Gary
Yes I know but what happens with BKMP if Mike wins his case. Will he go after Mayhems assets because of them funneling all the money into their other business?
Well I assume that the CEO of BKMP (whoever it is)thinks that it has given up the shares and BKMP owns nothing. If BKMP owns the shares and there is no BKMP,where do the shares go because it appears that BKMP isnt interested in keeping them.
The real question is what would happen if Mike won his case and the crtc awarded BKMP the 3 milliom shares. If Winnick is Samai then he would have to sell them as Sandy Winnick and not a fictious character. Legally I wouldnt think that a fictious person could not sell anything without some sort of paper trail leading back to the real CEO.Forging legal documents would not be good.
When they are writing as indiviuals and not acting as an agent of BKMP then I would think that they would have to keep them posted
There has to e legal way to remove a CEO that is hellbent on destroying a publically traded US company
I wonder if that message has been made public to possibly trace it back to Sandy Winnick? It appears that that alone is justification for the removal of whomever is in charge of BKMP by shareholders
Amazing that they would not keep it up considering they still own 3 milion shares. Are they still submitting quearterly's or is this even a company (Officially) anymore?
Forgive me for the questions, I've been out of the loop for a while now. Still have the sixty million shares though. Is Garrow trying to retake TFN?
Is Mike on our side?
YesI did. I thought that he said that she and Winnick were having an affair
I noticed that McCarthy giving her shares to Mike
Hiya DD....Whats up?
Did the company put out a PR on this yet?
SHUTUP AND STOP TALKING LOW DAMMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
is .02 possible here?
Time to call it a night see ya dd. Keep the faith
That happened to me all the time (Sorry not a member)
You are doing a fantastic job
How are you liking it so far? lolol
Exactly that is why I think someone is breaking the law by not filing. those 50 million shareswent somewhere and if sandy did buy them he should have reported it because as you know he is no longer as officer of the company....officially thus he would be required to file
I would think that if someone filed a suit against BKMP and Samai for the company then he would probably give it up rather than go to court
no i dont but someone posted it about three months ago
Can you give me another reason why a ceo of a company with one asset worth a million bucks is perfectly willing to give up that asset so easily? Remember he is invisible and he will not be seen.I think that last million bucks that was given to BKMP by someone effectively made them the largest shareholder of BKMP and that person or entity controls BKMP. That is when the OS went from 32 billion to 80 billion. Anyone wonder why someone would give BKMP one million bucks without wondering whether or not they would see a return?
Wow he is willing to give a million bucks worth of value in the company? I have speculated that Samai(if he exists) isnt really the one pulling the strings at BKMP. It appears with that last million dollars that was given to BKMP may have been Mayhem buying BKMP out and that is why BKMP is so willing to give up their assett. I still wonder if Mayhem is actually Samai.Just my opinion
I thought he was also required to give up all his shares?
Let me ask a very simple question. Has anyone actually emailed samai and asked him to sell BKMP for a couple hundred bucks. You are right he did offer it to me
LOL NOOOOOOOO (Well if stock buys the beer every saturday night during board meetings)
Hi DD Whats up here?
DID YOU BLEW THE MONKEY TOO?
PROBABLY. YOU NEED TO BLOW SOME BEERS DAMMIT
I'M SURE ALL THOSE FURRY ANIMAL YOU BLEW ARE SUCKING ON CIGARETTES NOW!!!!!!!
Shareholder Derivative Litigation
Shareholders may bring suit as representatives of the corporation in a derivative action. Such an action is designed to prevent wrongdoing by the officers or directors of the corporation or to seek a remedy for such wrongdoing. These suits are generally brought when the corporation itself (through its officers and directors) refuses to bring suit itself. A party bringing a derivative suit acts as a representative of an appropriate class of shareholders, and in the action the shareholders enforce claims that would be appropriate between the corporation and the officers and directors of the corporation. For example, if the officers of the corporation have breached a fiduciary duty owed to the corporation, shareholders may bring a derivative action to protect the interests of the corporation on behalf of the corporation. While these actions in many cases protect the rights of the corporation and shareholders of the corporation, these actions are often controversial. Shareholders should study the procedural and substantive provisions of state statutes to determine whether the action is appropriate and determine which formalities should be followed with respect to these actions.
HOW CAN I FREAKING WAKE UP AND DRANK AT THE THE SAME TIME????????????