Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Never saw a turtle flip onto its shell as readily as Tom turtles does. Bull one day, bear the next. Bear tomorrow, bull the next day.
Old news, right? You know that. Wasn't this referenced a day or two ago?
I think you meant pour and not poor? Nevertheless... why grammar, right? "Pouring salt on the wound." DM inflicts the wound, as you (among others) pour salt into it by gloating. Surprisingly shameful behavior, even for sadists. You lot resemble DM more than you care to realize. All birds of the same feather, of the same ilk, IMO. The shorts here just envy and despise how DM profits more than them, LOL. You're all greedy just the same.
Post R/S, are fractional shares rounded up?
Almost 1,000,000,000 in volume, and most are buys. Wen $0.0002, MMs?
Talk about "pouring salt on the wound." DM inflicts the wound, as you and TenKay (among others) pour salt into it by gloating. Surprisingly shameful behavior, even for sadists. You lot resemble DM more than you care to realize. All birds of the same feather, of the same ilk, IMO. The shorts here just envy and despise how DM profits more than them, LOL. You're all greedy just the same. Regardless, this was definitely a win for some today. DM took the cake though, for sure. I'm growing increasingly curious where this plane finally crashes.
Yeah, it would almost be comical if the lives of naive longs were not getting financially ruined in the process. I mean, $MULN just rolled out the first vehicle off the assembly line, and DM is already awarding himself 30,000,000 dilutive shares for this supposed "milestone." Awful timing and bad taste, IMO. Very disrespectful to bullish longs such as myself, which have soldiered through the inundation of reverse/splits and fluff PRs. You know it's bad if even Cal has been expressing a bearish sentiment toward the company lately.
Please, add me too. I understand the truth isn't compatible with your illegal pump-and-dump campaign. Nice echo chamber you're creating. By the way, how did you even see or respond to his post if he was supposedly on your "ignore" list?
Anyhow, there have been a lot of promises made and promises broken by this company. They haven't always treated longs with respect. Therefore, it should be reasonable for some here to express doubts and concerns about how this company operates.
Quite true, JuicePigs. In boasting about that epic win, all credibility was lost as the on-going illegal pump-and-dump campaign was exposed. Such is said about ill-gotten gains; it takes away the life of those who get it. Tic toc tic toc...
Are we still in a lying period... er, I mean quiet period?
K. Thanks.
Y'all still here, wacking bids and slapping asks? What's next in the pipeline for this sweaty $BOTY?
Reasonable question. I wondered the same. Let's await admin's response.
I know, right?!? But the more important question is (and remains), why did admin shift in that direction?
Um, you called me a con artist.
Ridiculous. Presumptuous. Who am I conning and how? Read my post history. I'm not Don Lapre in a tiny, one-bedroom apartment. Rather, I'm one of the most cynical bulls you'll ever converse with on the internet. Enjoy it while it lasts. I already expressed my skepticism regarding $MULN. My intentions are clear. How about you?
Not every hopeful, long, bull such as myself is a "paid pumper" or con artist or whatever narrative you can conjure up in your idle mind. Perhaps, I'm just a retail investor that stepped away from a former career path of 20+ years and am trying to figure out how to absolve debt and pay bills through investing.
Great. You and I can finally agree on something.
No, not at all. Let me break it down for you, TenKay. Relationships matter more than finances. Quote me on that.
Said the man that steadfastly reponds to my posts, within a minute or less, EVERY SINGLE TIME. Do you need a job, a friend, or perhaps a listening ear? I'm here. That's why I respond. Are you OK, TenKay? Relationships matter more than finances, just an FYI.
Phrase, not term... genius. Yes! I used that word, "counter," once. Yet you are still making love to that word. Why? Ask yourself.
You stated, "LOLOLOLOL." Really? Are you in kindergarten? You are an adult. Act like one.
Dude, my moniker is SmellMyFinger, so if I try to keep you in check, YOU have a problem. Just saying, is all
You seem infatuated with the word, "counter." Is there a different word that works for you? #StillArguingSemanticsLOL
Haha, right. Go in peace. You knew exactly what I meant all along and were just fishing for contention. Hence, the rhetorical questions, arguing over semantics, and everything else you were called out on from the beginning. Whether short or long, I wish you the best.
My point, exactly. Pretty basic concept, for most people anyhow.
Alas, I don't have a simpler way to explain it to you. I already tried twice to no avail, so a third time surely won't make a difference. GLTY, sir.
I already answered that, but then you shifted to arguing over semantics. Perhaps you have ulterior motives in continuing this discourse, which I alluded to earlier regarding your rhetorical questioning. Again, shorts would love nothing more than to short this stock into delinquency and delistment, which would likely mean a cheaper cover on the OTC. The reverse/split "counters" that agenda by keeping the stock in compliance with NASDAQ's rule of a minimum price of $1+. I understand that by doing so, it allows shorts to more easily add to their position. I also agree that shorts have made a ton of money off of this ticker, and that DM needs to deliver.
I thought we were discussing the pros/cons for shorts regarding a reverse/split and not arguing over semantics. My mistake.
A reverse/split may reduce the margin requirement, but it also entices shorts to increase risk by adding to their short position. Apart from a bankruptcy, that short position will eventually need to be covered in full in order to minimize parasitic drain from the CTB. A delisting is just one of many ways to try and make the position cheaper to cover.
What I can agree with you on however is that DM has a lot to prove. The onus is on him. While corruption abounds in the stock market and naked shorting is rampant, too many CEOs nowadays are decrying the aforementioned in lieu of building the business and generating profits. I don't know how many CEOs I've heard over the past year threaten to address FTDs with ShareIntel while not focusing enough on making the company worthy of investing in.
Perhaps so. There are two listings presently in my account: one with the pre-R/S CUSIP of 62526P208 and the other with the post-R/S CUSIP of 62526P307. I'm confirming that the latter can be sold if desired. Maybe others have a different situation.
What? I've had the exact same moniker since joining iHub two years ago on 08/11/2021. Again, this discussion might be a bit too heady for you. Maybe you should just go back to stacking alphabet blocks, and we'll call you when it's time for recess.
Not sure if you're being rhetorical or not at this point. Are you? Shorts maximize gains by driving the PPS down below regulatory standards in order to provoke a delisting. Historically, when stocks transition from NASDAQ to the OTC, they get brutalized (many become bankrupt). Therefore, a reverse/split helps keep the stock compliant and listed on NASDAQ, albeit with an artificially inflated price that merely implies value. In essence, it's just a parlor trick. You've been on iHub since 2011 and have 47K+ posts here, so I think you already know all of this. Therefore, what's your angle with the inquisitions?
Ad hominem? That's the best you can do? Not helpful in furthering an important discussion. Go back to playing in the sandbox... the adults are speaking.
Completely untrue. Retail CAN sell on Schwab, and Schwab owns TDA, so that means quite a bit of retail can sell if desired.
Sure, a 1:10 or higher ratio would've provided more of a buffer, but then no more reverse/splits could be utilized to counter the crooks that illegally short-and-distort this stock. Even a 1:100 ratio couldn't scaffold the PPS for long while under so much selling pressure. Don't get me wrong, I love shorties; they assume all of the risk through illegal practices while banging prices down for longs to capitalize on. Also, they do well in promoting skepticism and exposing fraudulent activity, albeit while being frauds themselves. To that end regarding $MULN, DM needs to put up or shut up. No more gimmicks (black boxes) or lip service. What's necessary moving forward is undeniable proof of legitimate production, transparency through consistent PRs, and the prudent handling of any revenue generated. Even then, it might not be enough to avoid a delisting since the SEC could require more than 20 consecutive days of closing at $1+.
C'mon, don't be coy (deceptive). You know why a 1:9 ratio was chosen... to avoid breaking the Excessive Reverse Stock Splits rule. A ratio of 1:10 or above would've broken Rule 5810(c)(3)(A). You know that.
Maybe when it hits $0.0001. Thanks for the financial advice!
Not a single thing you've said makes sense.
Well, you're supposedly hard of hearing (and understanding).
Again, Big Brother... I wasn't talking to you. Can you please just allow yadotn to respond?
Was I talking to you? I think not. Please, let yadotn respond.