Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Peer-reviewed research why exactly? This is not academia. What's important is whether the product is there and works or not, which is expected in due time. This is what's important for users and investors. People do not refer to peer-reviewed research about Tesla's autopilot before buying a Tesla car so why would they do that with HUMBL? They deal with functionality and specifications and what counts is fulfilling them.
This is possible of course. It's possible too that the price will be much much higher after going into full operation on a global scale, more acquisitions, and generating revenue from many streams. I say the latter scenario is more likely but it's just my opinion.
The price went up and down many times before the RS. Most probably your account would've fluctuated the same way with or without the RS over the same short period. There's no reason to relate your down value to the RS, it's related to your purchase price. The RS does not mean the price will not go down at all, it means there will hopefully be less volatility and more tendency for the price to appreciate over time at a better rate. If you want to consider the change in your position value, check over the coming 1-6 months.
Good catch, I'm glad you found that funny. Good that this is your only comment on the post content.
I think this is a mistake. This is the HUMBL/United Nations information from Forbes: "HUMBL is working on Fortune 500 partnerships and was featured by the UN 2030 Agenda."
For an OTC company to achieve that, it says something.
Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/marenbannon/2020/06/25/rising-startups-to-watch-with-diverse-founders/
You never heard of Costway but seems 10 million+ monthly customers have, that's what's important. You can doubt that all you want but until you provide a counterevidence, it remains that way.
And who mentioned anything about "using Humblpay exclusively"? No business in its right mind would ever close all payment channels and leave only one. HUMBL is expected to work alongside the other payment options and it goes beyond the mere functionality. Having HUMBL listed besides Visa, Master Card, American Express, PayPal, and others is a sign of trust by the merchant as well as an acknowledgement of HUMBL as a viable alternative to the big names in the field. That could result in a snowball effect.
At the end, Costway is only one merchant. HUMBL's vision is much larger than that.
That would be huge and I think it's only one part of the picture. I guess - and it's only a guess - that Costway+HUMPL is only one of multiple deals that are supposed to be announced later at a time HUMPL sees fit and by then it would be ready to show officially as a payment option on the website. I think for some reason this information slipped early via Costway's tweet. I wonder what other deals/implementations are happening right now.
Of course! How would they show HUMPL payment option when the application is available only for internal testing and not yet available for public use? I see it as they have reached an agreement together and preparing for integrating HUMBL payment in their payment process after its official release. Most probably the integration is currently being implemented and internally tested in preparation for release.
Of course you are free to wait, the same as others are free to jump at the opportunity after they saw the huge potential here. There's always risk, but if/when that potential materialized, it would probably be too late to make huge returns. I imagine what if those who bought at triple zero level decided instead to wait too, they would've missed out on millions of dollars. Now we are in phase 2, let's see if a similar scenario repeats again. In this game, waiting is inversely proportional to risk but to rewards too. Keep waiting while others are making money. To each his own.
You did not mention that out of the current 323 Costway complaints, currently there are only 2 unresolved and 0 unanswered. Use the filter at the top to check yourself. Notice that not every complaint is a proof that something is really wrong, and not everything that's really wrong is not fixed, resulting on more trust that the company's is serious about satisfying its customers.
This board is for HUMBL investors/traders. Costway's customer satisfaction is irrelevant in this context. Costway serves more than 10 million customers per month (source https://www.costway.com/About-Costway/). What's important here is the number of transactions that can go through HUMBL.
However, if you really want to discuss Costway numbers then let's do it. Load all the complaints in the page till to get the full view shown below. As of the time of writing this message:
- Monthly customers: 10 million+
- Oldest complaint date: 06/06/2018
- Latest complaint date: 02/19/2021
- Duration: 2 years, 8 months, 14 days, or 32 months, 14 days (~ 32.5 months).
For simplicity, assuming the monthly customers served is fixed throughout that period then:
Total number of customers during the complaints period covered: 10,000,000 * 32.5 = 325 million.
Complaints ratio:
Total submitted complaint = 323 / 325,000,000 = approx. 0%
Total unresolved complaints = 2 / 325,000,000 = approx. 0%
So Costway served approximately 325 million customers and received only 323 from which is solved 321 and only 2 remained unsolved, that's be an above excellent record, great, amazing.
Now let's talk about what's relevant, how many Costway's 10 million+ annual transactions can go through HUMBL. And that's only one customer, what if more are added? Especially that Costway could encourage more businesses to do the same.
Thank you for giving us the chance to dig deeper and do better DD, please keep it coming.
No it should not. Each case is different. A hope is different from a promise. I'll need to double check to verify what to expect regarding the app in the 4-6 weeks he mentioned.
What's that got to do with my reply? I replied to the claim that the app has been delayed already, that's related to the timing mentioned in January's call. Regarding the 4-6 weeks, we are still in week 1.
There is no pause or delay in releasing the app. Brian said he "hoped" to release the app in February. That was only a tentative time, he did not promise a certain release date. The app may be released anytime they see fit.
Does Nasdaq have an OS limit? What would happen if $TSNPD moved to Nasdaq then increased the OS while maintaining a good PPS? What if the management does not intend to move to Nasdaq at all? How will the business look like at that time? Will there be a share buyback? Too many unknowns to discuss at this point in time. imo, the better question to ask is, from this point forward, does this seem like a good investment for me?
I think the shares are currently being redistributed by shifting more into the strong hands of investors and less from traders/flippers as $TSNP has moved into the $TSNPD/$HMBL territory with much lower OS, higher PPS, and better fundamentals and promise that make it more of an investment company than a day trading stock than before. The post-split dust needs to settle first then we may see where it goes form there. If you are an investor here, you need to have patience.
Then you assumed they'd do acquisitions with the full remaining AS which is just an opinion. Maybe they want to have a big buffer in the AS until everything is decided and they know how much exactly they need before reducing the AS instead of increasing it 500m or 1 billion every time they need to do something new? The fact is, neither you or I know the details and so far, the management has delivered to their promises and the available DD suggests that the run a genuine business and they know what they are doing. So again, it's either you trust them and let them run the show or this is probably not the right place for you.
The OS is 974 million as of now, not 7.4 billion.
Either you believe they have a plan and trust them or not. If not, probably this is not the right place for you.
Probably in the form of more acquisitions.
I checked, it seems the OTC zero commission applies to US stocks only but not to OTC foreign stocks where the commission is $50. Check here https://www.schwab.com/legal/schwab-pricing-guide-for-individual-investors
Do you know other penny stock-friendly brokers?
As far as I know, all zero commission brokers actually charge commission for OTC stocks, not only TDA.
"Note: $0 commission applies to U.S. exchange-listed stocks, ETFs, and options. A $0.65 per contract fee applies for options trades, with no exercise or assignment fees. A $6.95 commission applies to online trades of over-the-counter (OTC) stocks (stocks not listed on a U.S. exchange)."
Check the note at the end here https://www.tdameritrade.com/pricing.page
Seems it was removed. Anyway the pre-market state looks fine, check for yourself.
This is not correct. $TSNP previous close on TDA is $0.21. The pre-market bid X ask as of now (7:40 AM) is 0.2098 X 0.2139. As for the 0.0185 value, it was a technical glitch as shown here https://twitter.com/HUMBLpay/status/1335190116386533381
Thank you.
You got this data from Thinkorswim?
Good find.
Correction, calculations in my post #49845 were made for the price 0.18514 by mistake while the correct price is 0.018514. That logic is now void. It turned out to be a system glitch as shown here https://twitter.com/GeorgeASharp/status/1334986937317220354
and here https://twitter.com/HUMBLpay/status/1335190116386533381
and was corrected as shown here https://twitter.com/HUMBLpay/status/1335190218312335362
Logically this is not correct. December 3 closed @ 0.169. December 4 opened @ 0.19 and traded higher all day. The only way someone could trade @ 0.18514 during pre-market on Dec 4. That is, someone bought 8.5 million shares HIGHER THAN previous close and BEFORE market open (before knowing Dec 4 trading range). It's more reasonable that the buyer was eager to buy shares and expected the price to go higher that day that he didn't mind paying more than the previous close to get his shares before the open, and it worked well for him so far. He was up $41,310 shortly at market open and up $211,310 at market close of 0.21. Is this the start of big players coming in? Maybe.
More details here https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfitBeat/status/1335105522073296897
Good information. This shows that according to the last trading session on Fidelity, there were 5,191 $TSNP buy orders vs. 1,202 sell orders (total 6,393), or 81.2% buys vs. 18.8% sells. The sell/buy ratio is 4.32. In other words, the buy (demand) is more than 4 times the sell (supply). I believe that this is the result of $TSNP shares keep moving from weak to strong hands and long-term investors, taking shares off the "practical float" that is actually available for daily trading.
Source: https://eresearch.fidelity.com/eresearch/gotoBL/fidelityTopOrders.jhtml
$TSNP as it is now is a great investment opportunity with a lot of potential imo.
Do you have a documented evidence that this is paid advertising? Of you don't and this is only your personal opinion?
No I won't call Forbes, enough for me that this page was published on www.forbes.com . Either you provide an evidence for what you mentioned or it passes as a false claim.
The fact remains, HUMBL with its founders Brian Foote and Michele Rivera was listed on forbes.com as on of the "Rising Startups To Watch With Diverse Founders" and the proof is here https://www.forbes.com/sites/marenbannon/2020/06/25/rising-startups-to-watch-with-diverse-founders
Actually you can google HUMBL pay and you can find a lot of results with promising information, one of which is on Forbes here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/marenbannon/2020/06/25/rising-startups-to-watch-with-diverse-founders
If you google HUMBLE pay mobile app you will also find a lot of results including this demo of 3 apps: HUMBLE mobile wallet, merchant software, and agent software. Look here: https://www.humblpay.com/media/product-tours
The fact that the mobile app is not available in the market for public use yet is what makes this a great investment opportunity (considering risk vs. reward). It's the time to get in (if you believe in it). Because if the mobile was available already, the share price would probably be above $1 or maybe a lot more by now and it would be too late to make huge gains.
I like this part: "HUMBL is working on Fortune 500 partnerships and was featured by the UN 2030 Agenda".
Ripple is selling one-third of its stake in MoneyGram for the first time. MoneyGram is in the same industry as HUMBL.
A good find.
No need for such example. Even if he didn't RS another stock before, he still could do it with $TSNP despite his promise, nothing is certain. The point is risk vs. reward. I see a huge reward-to-risk potential with all the known factors counted in. Whoever is not willing to accept that risk then this stock is not the right place for him. And trading/investment in general.