Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
@stealofadeal: You had no clue two weeks ago when you were calling this a total scam. Now you're on board at the current price levels. Based on your past record, I'm going to be able to retire later this year. Pick a lane and at least have the conviction to stay in it.
But AWESOME support and BOOM!
And now a slight pullback to shake out the hit and run money...
Blastoff!
Current Bid: .019
Current Ask: .0189
Good sign!
Nope, kicks you out.
@stealofadeal, there's a book you should read by Al Franken, "Lies, and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them."
There is NO mechanism by which one shareholder can override a majority vote by the shareholders as a whole. Please get some help; or if this is an intentional manipulation, get investigated.
Totally correct! I just posted the math a few minutes ago from the latest filing I could find.
Once again:
Share totals taken from last filing I could find.
A shares = 1,500,000,000 shares @ par of .0001 per share
B (preferred, and the type S supposedly has) shares = 50,000,000 @ par of .001 per share
So a B share has 10x the voting power of an A share, and there is 2,000,000,000 in total voting power (1.5B in A shares plus 500M in B shares).
If person has 40,000,000 B shares (assuming this number from stealadeals post is even accurate), that would equate to voting power of 400,000,000 class A shares.
400,000,000 of 2,000,000,000 = 20% voting power, which is not a majority to block the voting power of Class A shares.
stealofadeal, you state you have facts, but math is math. A control block does not mean that person controls the company, just that they have enough shares to potentially influence a vote, usually defined as 5% or more of shares.
Wow, just wow. Please go spout your nonsense somewhere else. Your comment about a no brainer sounds like an admission.
Self-professed newbie here, so if there's something I'm missing please explain:
Share totals taken from last filing I could find.
A shares = 1,500,000,000 shares @ par of .0001 per share
B (preferred) shares = 50,000,000 @ par of .001 per share
So a B share has 10x the voting power of an A share, and there is 2,000,000,000 in total voting power (1.5B in A shares plus 500M in B shares).
If person has 40,000,000 of B that would equate to voting power of 400,000,000 class A shares.
400,000,000 of 2,000,000,000 = 20% voting power, which is not a majority to block the voting power of Class A shares.
Thoughts?
They tried to get us to panic sell by dipping under.01, but congrats to those who held strong! If we close above .01 today, that should be the support going forward.
You mean like it did yesterday, and numerous times over the past month?
The answer to your specific question is "Yes."
The answer to the question you are really asking is "If I could time OTC stocks with 100% accuracy, I would have retired a long time ago."
To quote Han Solo, “I don’t know, I can imagine quite a bit!”
Probably, I don't have any shame in saying I'm probably on the lower side of number of shares. But that doesn't weigh into my thinking at all when it comes to dotting i's and crossing t's before making statements that may feed naysayers if taken as incorrect or out of context.
Did you? You've never heard of a last minute situation or objection that delayed or completely reversed the course of a court proceeding? Good luck basing all you decisions on what "should" happen.
Because until it was officially signed off by the judge, you knew nothing. You assumed, and you know how that can go sometimes. Now we can move forward and leave the naysayers behind.
Official! Judge has disposed in favor of Mark Miller and case is now marked closed!
Someone else can post images of the docs, but here is a link to the court website where you can search and confirm.
Court Website
To start, I am a shareholder and have increased my holdings by 40% during these crazy ups and downs, so I definitely want this stock to take off.
But also realize that nothing has been finalized yet. Yes, the clerk has entered a default judgement (which requires a judges approval). Yes, there is a court hearing set for the 22nd of April. Yes, the attorneys for Mark Miller have made a motion for final judgement. And yes, a potential shareholders meeting date has been proposed.
BUT, none of these mean anything unless the judge signs off on the default judgement and final judgement request. Judges are human and strange things happen. Any delays will just give the bashers reason to deflate and set a new floor for the stock price, especially when a lot of shareholders are saying this is a done deal. It SHOULD be a done deal, but until the ink is dry, don't give them fodder.
I know, just saying there's no need to feed their negativity or engage in a battle of speculation. Once Mark clears all the hurdles and we are not just on track but motoring toward prosperity, we can bash them right back.
Admittedly I've only been in this stock a short time, but I like what I see and hope we all make life changing money from it.
All good as soon as the judge signs off. Again, don't give the haters a chance to manipulate if there is a procedural delay.
Another court doc just posted. Motion for entry of default final judgement in favor of Mark Miller.
Exhibit G in the filing also sets out a proposed shareholders meeting on May 27, 2021 at 11:00AM Miami time via Zoom.
Positive movement!
Just a notice of hearing. No details other than date and time.
Late court filing last night. Next hearing is scheduled for Zoom on the 22nd.
So let's not give the naysayers ammunition by saying that Mark is "confirmed" just yet, there are still court matters to close before he is officially in charge and can set dates for shareholders meetings.
Believe me, I want this thing to skyrocket, but whenever the normal course of court action is viewed as a delay, it just gives the bottom feeders another reason to disparage NWGC.
Just that nothing is "official" until it's entered and signed off by the court.
Court case updated
Default entered in favor of Mark Miller.
Case search page
Just enter Mark Miller for first and last names on the search page.
Well, title of that statute is "48.161 Method of substituted service on nonresident." So something in the service was insufficient.
I am on the NWGC (Mark Miller) team, so hope that it is something that can be rectified quickly.
Florida Statute webpage
Looking up F.S. 48.161(1) it sounds like the judge didn't like the service attempted on the current NWGC management.
New court entry, default not entered because of "Other AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE; GREEN CARD (SIGNED); GREEN & WHITE RECEIPT F.S. 48.161(1)"
Sounds like a T wasn't crossed or an I not dotted.
Looking for great gains, but this is a disappointing delay.