Maybe you should read carefully what the Judge "says." In order to survive a 12(b)(6)b motion to dismiss, plaintiffs must state a claim that is "plausible on its face." (Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570). The court order says that the "Amended Complaint adequately alleges . . . material misrepresentations." You, however, have deceptively conflated the court's finding that the complaint satisfied the 12(b)(6) threshold (a preliminary threshold that gives little weight to the actual merits of the case but rather whether the complaint adequately plead a plausible claim/showing of entitlement to relief) with the court ruling that the releases were materially misrepresented with respect to the Cobra farms.
Once again, the court has not ruled on the merits of the case, only on the FRCP sufficiency of the complaint. You consistently act like you understand all of the legal elements of the case, but your arguments suggest a superficial understanding, only enough to scare people away.
GLTY Glowboy.