Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Nothing to do with Escrows - which is why it says “Brookfield” in the announcement very clearly.
But who cares, right?
Sure - it was so surprising that the Novo Nordisk 2023 dividend ended up being paid out to the Novo Nordisk shareholders and not to Escrow holders as you predicted. Who could have known?
But there is always 2024 to look forward to with more “theories“ from you - right?
The Discovery Document proved that JPM was guilty of RICO.
JPM settled fast to avoid further litigation from a Court Ruling.
None of this true of course; there was no such guilty ruling against JPM. You just keep making up ridiculous bs but you clearly have fans who love this.
This really isn’t complicated.
RD was referring to an announcement with a date in December 2017.
Everything else he just made up as will be very obvious in the next 10 days.
You do realize that the date in this announcement was December 18, 2017 - right?
But who cares if you pretend that this had anything to do with 2023 or with Escrows?
I’m saying that people should not make up statements about guilty verdicts against JPM - this is not complicated.
This is not complicated.
If there is such a guilty verdict against JPM why don’t you post a link? Or maybe just show us a press article where this is discussed?
There is of course no link or evidence for this non-existing “settlement”. The actually existing settlement in 2016 resulted in JPM receiving (not paying!) money: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN10U2E4/
Why do you make this up?
There is of course no such court ruling forcing JPM to pay anything, which is why there is never a link.
So why do you make this up? Who has anything to gain from these absurd “theories”?
Neither had the Novo Nordisk dividend payment, a Bank of America bond, the name change of a PIMCO credit fund or the amended DTCC opening hours on Columbus Day - all of whom were proposed by RD this year as signs of Escrow payments.
Its a standard bond issued by BofA, maturing next week without any connection to Escrows.
Looking forward to your explanation after 12/18 why no money has come to Escrows, just like in all your previous theories.
Nothing will happen on the 18th of course.
This is not complicated - the bonds issued by Bank of America in 2020 which will come due and be repaid in less than a week have nothing to do with Escrows.
To be pretend otherwise is ridiculous nonsense - as will be very obvious when next week comes and goes without any Escrow related payment.
But you will have long moved on and created several new “theories“ by then.
Absolutely, the name change from PIMCO Global Credit Opportunity Master Fund LDC
to PIMCO Global Cross-asset Opportunities Master Fund LDC is definitely a sign of coming Escrow payouts.
You should now of course
You have been wrong literally hundreds if not thousands of time before.
You‘re definitely a “Retired College Finance Professor“ - right?
It has NOTHING to do with Escrows, absolutely zero because it’s just a bond issued by Bank of America in 2020 which will mature and be repaid in December 2023.
This is not complicated.
We know what her “source” is - it’s in Bopfan’s actual court filing
“In late 2019 Plaintiff received information from another Legacy Holder in communication with an employee of a major securities broker (the “Source”).”
It’s literally in writing in her court filing - she received the information from another Escrow holder who claims to have spoken to the “source” at a brokerage firm.
She is such a great lawyer that she brought multiple lawsuits without a single piece of evidence, relying on a “source“ which she admitted to never actually having spoken to.
Quite an interesting legal strategy & so strange that she lost again and again.
Interesting that you quote Alice as an authority after she failed to provide a single piece of evidence for her claims in court and lost every single one of her lawsuits as a result
She did lose every single court case relating to WaMu. She also admitted that she never actually spoke to her source.
That should not be controversial, it’s a simple fact
Interesting that she presented literally no single proof in her many lawsuits; which she all lost without exception.
Of course none of this has anything to do with WaMu - but why would RD care about facts?
He has literally made hundreds of failed predictions and will continue to make equally failed predictions in the future.
It obviously has nothing to do with Escrows.
You need to ask RD why he keeps pretending otherwise.
Deposits are liabilities (and not assets) of a bank - so the assumption of deposits is economically the same as paying a purchse price.
Absolutely
If AZ claims that Feb and July are 6 months apart, because that’s when he receives his “semi-annual payments“, then it must be true.
Because semi-annual payments are always made 5 months after the last payment, right?
Correct, DL's actions regarding my WMB Bond holdings and Direct Ownership, is the reason of a direct deposit from the Trustee' into my account ... yeppers, Feb 2023, then July 2023, and Feb 2024 coming up quickly' ... WMB Bonds are a semi-annual, continued servicing by, (shhhhhh), doesn't matter ~
If you want to claim to have received semi-annual payments it would a little bit more credible to say that you received them in FEBRUARY and AUGUST because these two months are actually 6 months apart.
But who needs facts like a calendar, right?
And because Doreen is such a friend of yours, you were THE ONLY Escrow holder who got paid in February, right?
Because that‘s exactly what happened, right?
Literally the only thing which is obvious is that you have no financial know-how whatsoever as evidenced by this and hundreds of failed “theories“ before.
But you are a “retired College Finance professor“, right?
RD has claimed to be a “retired College Finance professor“ and (just to quote one example) to have found evidence of imminent Escrow payments in the dividend payment for a Danish pharma company, which was simply made by JPM as the depository agent for the ADRs of this Danish company.
This has nothing remotely to do with science….
You ask others to “hang their heads in shame“ after having made hundreds of predictions with a perfect 100% track record of failure?
Don‘t forget that RD is a „retired College Finance professor“ - he must be right
Of course in reality this has nothing to do with Escrows, just like all of your similar predictions had nothing to do with Escrows. But who needs reality?
Of course nothing like this will happen on Oct 17.
But you will have moved on to new “theories“ and new deadlines by then.
Can you not at least change your Columbus Day predictions now that Columbus Day is over?
I guess Thanksgiving is next?
This is what the FDIC is actually saying in reality
The Receiver does not currently have and does not anticipate accumulating sufficient assets to pay in full all of the allowed claims of the general unsecured creditors of WAMU. As a result, the Receiver does not project having sufficient assets to make any distributions to WAMU subordinate note holders or equity holders. Therefore, it is unlikely that any distributions will be made to WMI or its successor on its claim as sole equity holder of the failed bank
https://www.fdic.gov/resources/resolutions/bank-failures/failed-bank-list/wamu-settlement.html
Again amazing Due Diligence to show that the DTCC is providing only limited services on Columbus Day - surely a definite sign of Escrow payouts, what other reasons could there be?
Sure - Columbus Day falling on the the 2nd Monday in October must be a definite sign for Escrow payouts!!!
Sure - Columbus Day falling on the the 2nd Monday in October must be a definite sign for Escrow payouts!!!