Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You make all of this up of course, but who needs facts, right? In reality JPM’s share price reached another ATH this week.
Maybe you should tell their shareholders that JPM has to pay hundreds of billions for WMB more than 15 years later - they seem to blissfully ignorant.
Claims of “currently invisible” billions from JPM are the latest nonsensical b/s being fed to a grateful audience.
It doesn’t matter how many of these theories fail, there will always be new ones.
Yes - WMB was a S&L and obviously had deposit insurance by the FDIC.
Not sure how anyone can dispute that.
Of course you have no evidence for this claim - but who needs facts when you can just spew more nonsense?
Spoiler alert: You can easily find old WaMu ads which say “FDIC Insured” at the end.
Please go to a JPM message board and tell them that their bank still needs to pay the purchase price for WMB - and see what happens
So JPM will need to pay 100 or 200 B for LIBOR and also in addition still needs to pay for the WMB assets.
All this while the JPM shares are actually trading at an all time high because investors are totally ignorant of this impending disaster.
You mean JPM paying 100 or 200 billions in LIBOR fines will not affect them which is why the market is totally ignorant of this?
Sure - JPM is secretly servicing WMI’s assets, which is why their investors have no problem that JP will have to pay 100 or 200 B in LIBOR fines - such a small sum would make no difference on the JP share price anyway…
And in reality JPM of course is trading at all-time-highs despite such forthcoming 100 B or 200 B LIBOR payments - but all the JPM shareholders are simply clueless, right?
Highlighting facts is being a „bad guy“?
What exactly is the value of 15 years of failed „theories“ which are 100% contradicted by literally all official statements, documents, SEC filings etc?
JPM share trading at all-time highs, literally no one expecting them to make multi (hundred) billion payments for LIBOR.
In reality of course the “Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System“ has no relevance to Escrows.
But why care about reality when you can make all of this up - these theories will be soon forgotten and replaced just like all of your hundreds of similar theories before and the hundreds that will surely follow from here.
Who would pay these 400b? JPM share price doesn’t look like anyone is expecting these guys to make any multi billion payments (not to mention hundreds of b)
Could you give a quick update on your predictions for Jan 19th and 21st, given that today is Jan 22nd?
Many thanks!
In reality this of course has nothing to do with Escrows.
But who needs reality when you can just make up one “theory” after the other?
How did that play out by the way?
Why do you keep makings things up after literally having been wrong 100% over the last few years?
You have literally never been right.
And once Jan 19th and 21th come around these latest “theories“ of yours will again be proven to have been nothing but stupid nonsense.
But you are DEFINITELY a “Retired College Finance Professor“, correct?
Brookfield will literally NEVER pay out their investors’ assets to Escrows.
Not sure how anyone can naive enough to believe that.
Have you informed Brookfield that they should hand over their investors’ assets to Escrow holders?
Their investors will surely be happy to donate their money - you just need to tell them that you are “Retired College Finance Professor”.
Sounds like a great idea for anyone expecting that JP will pay hundreds of billions to Escrow holders as the shares are trading at ATH
The “class” where you explain to your students that an asset manager will just pay out all of its assets under management to some former shareholders of a completely unrelated company?
What happened to the other hundreds of your “predictions” exactly?
You are literally the only self-proclaimed “Retired College Finance Professor” who thinks that an asset manager like Brookfield could just pay out his clients’ assets to the former shareholders of a completely different company.
But who cares, right?
Sure - you should let the Brookfield investors know that their money belongs to Escrows.
Just tell them that you are a “Retired College Finance Professor” in case they have doubts…
Nothing to do with Escrows - which is why it says “Brookfield” in the announcement very clearly.
But who cares, right?
Sure - it was so surprising that the Novo Nordisk 2023 dividend ended up being paid out to the Novo Nordisk shareholders and not to Escrow holders as you predicted. Who could have known?
But there is always 2024 to look forward to with more “theories“ from you - right?
The Discovery Document proved that JPM was guilty of RICO.
JPM settled fast to avoid further litigation from a Court Ruling.
None of this true of course; there was no such guilty ruling against JPM. You just keep making up ridiculous bs but you clearly have fans who love this.
This really isn’t complicated.
RD was referring to an announcement with a date in December 2017.
Everything else he just made up as will be very obvious in the next 10 days.
You do realize that the date in this announcement was December 18, 2017 - right?
But who cares if you pretend that this had anything to do with 2023 or with Escrows?
I’m saying that people should not make up statements about guilty verdicts against JPM - this is not complicated.
This is not complicated.
If there is such a guilty verdict against JPM why don’t you post a link? Or maybe just show us a press article where this is discussed?
There is of course no link or evidence for this non-existing “settlement”. The actually existing settlement in 2016 resulted in JPM receiving (not paying!) money: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN10U2E4/
Why do you make this up?
There is of course no such court ruling forcing JPM to pay anything, which is why there is never a link.
So why do you make this up? Who has anything to gain from these absurd “theories”?
Neither had the Novo Nordisk dividend payment, a Bank of America bond, the name change of a PIMCO credit fund or the amended DTCC opening hours on Columbus Day - all of whom were proposed by RD this year as signs of Escrow payments.
Its a standard bond issued by BofA, maturing next week without any connection to Escrows.
Looking forward to your explanation after 12/18 why no money has come to Escrows, just like in all your previous theories.
Nothing will happen on the 18th of course.
This is not complicated - the bonds issued by Bank of America in 2020 which will come due and be repaid in less than a week have nothing to do with Escrows.
To be pretend otherwise is ridiculous nonsense - as will be very obvious when next week comes and goes without any Escrow related payment.
But you will have long moved on and created several new “theories“ by then.
Absolutely, the name change from PIMCO Global Credit Opportunity Master Fund LDC
to PIMCO Global Cross-asset Opportunities Master Fund LDC is definitely a sign of coming Escrow payouts.
You should now of course
You have been wrong literally hundreds if not thousands of time before.
You‘re definitely a “Retired College Finance Professor“ - right?
It has NOTHING to do with Escrows, absolutely zero because it’s just a bond issued by Bank of America in 2020 which will mature and be repaid in December 2023.
This is not complicated.