Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Pay no attention to the snotty little pos dennisb68, Bob, for it's easy to see that's all he is....he classified himself with that gratuitous remark about the decoder ring....stupid little pos....probably some 13 year old knowitall who'll never get past 7th grade....
because you know, as we all do, that it's all over...our money's gone and that's all there is to it....the end.
Independent directors? Are you kidding? This has always been a 2 or 3 man company, maybe 4 for a short time once....that includes board of directors, president, vp, ceo, technical staff, sales staff, secretary, and janitor, everyone. In a 2 or 3 man company, there are no 'independent', or even 'outside', directors. That'd spoil the whole thing.
I got 315 ft. with some belly skids on the 6th try....good fun!
I agree with all you said, especially "I just think there are not enough investors willing to buy shares from other investors." Pretty basic stuff, and the only thing that will make enough investors willing to buy is revenues and earnings or reasonable expectations of them in the immediate future. And very few will buy even then if they realize how badly the management has screwed all their investors with the massive dilutions that have taken place.
What a curious thought process. Actually, they were all sells. And they were all buys. In other words, if someone sells one thousand shares, someone else buys one thousand thousand shares, and the total volume of shares traded is one thousand shares, not two thousand shares as your post indicates.
I think demand is already prevailing.
November has been huge....yes, the chart shows exactly what has been occurring: HUGE VOLUMES OF SELLING, SELLING, SELLING. Which we all knew. Funny how it always coincides with optimistic projections of future great things by management and others, new and old, complete with details of why everything is really going to be OK.
It's called "keep the suckers buying and holding while we milk them of everything we can get".
If everything was going to be so good in the near (or even distant) future, does anyone really think supposedly smart people would be disposing of massive volumes of stock at rummage sale prices?
It has a very prosaic name: pump and dump. Sorry, but it's an old, old story in the market.
Why is it that no matter which spokesman is supposedly writing the responses, there is always the same kind of incorrect and awkward English sentence construction: "In order to progress Medify Solutions forward..." ;..."..more full explained.."; "...these kind of announcements..", etc. All sounds like a 6th grade work.
A "stick market floatation"? These people make so many basic mistakes in attempting to communicate in the English language that I wonder if these communications are coming from the basement of a boiler room training school somewhere in the Balkans.
It IS good news! Maybe there is some possibility the company will be able to develop a business plan if the BT pipeline expansion works out and users show up and the technology works as intended and the medical community is as enthusiastic a group of users of it as we think they will be.
I'm sure everyone here appreciates your efforts to do what MDFY's management should be doing to keep investors informed. I certainly do. It's too bad they are so incompetent and incapable of communicating coherently. When (if) they start having significant revenues they should put you on the payroll.
Thanks again. Please keep it up.
Ever hear a psychiatrist's thumbnail definition of insanity?
It's doing the same thing over and over and over again, expecting different results every time.
Pluck. Pluck. Pluck. Pluck.
Right, on Friday.....or the following Monday...or, failing that, by Tuesday for sure. Oh, wait, where have I heard precisely the same thing ever and over and..........oh shit, now I remember.
end of this week or beginning of next....now let me see, where have i heard that before.......oh shit, i remember now....
Contract Engineering?....what discipline? I'm a retired Piping Designer/Plant Layout Specialist who did many years of contract work all over the USA, Mexico, and Canada. Great work...good life...I loved it. Ended up retiring from Stone and Webster (too good a direct gig to pass up)....thought about going back to work because of the great rates out there...boom times again and I'm out of the action....bummer.
I wasn't referring to you. I was referring to MDFYFORLONG's silly post.
Ah yes, the shares that were used to pay for the positive reviews by the stock promoters. I'm sure those were all sold as soon as they were available to the promoters, and are all gone now.
So where does current selling come from? Market makers getting rid of inventory? I'm sure they see no further need to maintain much of one.
Yeah right, restricted for two years...and how do we know that....just because he says so? Then how have they been selling them? Where else does the selling come from? Think about it.
Anyone who thinks he (or she) will "have my money back" because of some political or legal action is living in a dream world. Must be some liberal barking moonbat with absolutely no grasp on reality.
I like to at last see at least half of one...
Do you know what the terms of the restrictions are?
And, to a large extent, they're selling to those already scammed earlier to get them into this disaster.
How can you say the insider shares aren't awful? They're the primary way scammers make money when they've exhausted all other means of getting money from suckers who believe the great story and will stick around for the end game.
Who do you think has been selling lately? Where did they get the shares to sell? Why do you think they're selling if there are such great things just around the next corner (as always)?
Wake up. We've been had.
And they didn't even have to be able use good English to do it.
You guys are all nuts. All this chatter about prices from $10/share to $100/share, buyout scenarios and such, and this company's management (probably one guy with a good imagination, a telephone, and a poor command of English, operating out of a boiler room somewhere) has yet to prove he can generate any kind of a revenue stream.
You're all living in a dream world. Unless you're just one or two guys pumping and dumping to keep the scheme afloat.
LOL...you're good, tjak.
At last, someone who sees clearly and acknowledges reality. A rarity on this board.
Whether it was a scam or just a lot of good work that couldn't be brought to fruition because of bad management or because of unrealistic expectations of government and medical bureaucracies, it's clear that MDFY is not going to deliver.
To bad. How sad. We're had.
Anyone buying this dead dog now has recognition problems....we've been had.
And anyone who thinks they'll ever punish the perpetrators of this with the law or a lawsuit is in a dream world. Can't be done. Sorry.
If you think it'll happen, please refer me to the last judgement you've seen for a like situation (stock scam on the pink sheets), including proof of payment of the judgement, and I'll osculate your nether end in front of the courthouse at high noon and give you a week to draw a crowd.
Roll over, you're dead and don't know it.
We've been had.
Righto, old chap.
I'd like to see audited revenues, for a starter. Significant and verified by a reputable accounting firm. Then I'd like to see growing numbers of users, verified and reported and growing from quarter to quarter.
Not just a "we've shipped a few units here or there and later that should result in a few more being sent to...", etc etc.
I see a lot of wishful thinking here. Wishes and dreams......
But hardheaded reality tells me we've been had......anyone buying pinkies should get used to a lot more of these than the successful gambles. Pinkies are a lot like slot-machines: you MIGHT hit one once in a great while for a bundle, but it'll be extremely rare. No matter how good the story.
Not a thing happened to him. I still don't want a buyout. I don't take this kind of risk for peanuts. Peanuts is what it would be if the company is sold for a few bucks, which is what we were talking about in those posts. I only take this kind of risk if the potential is enormous. If I lose it all, that's just the breaks of the game.
But I don't indulge in wishful thinking; that's for the weak-minded. And there seems to be no dearth of those here.
To think that that "forward book" on the company's website constitutes documentation requires a delusional mind. Reminds me of the old shell game. Just one question about that. What verification do you have of that information?
Lots of wishful thinking going on around here.
lookup...How many delivered units? 3? 20? How many is "many more"? How many are required to show a profit? How much revenue is expected? Vagueness isn't convincing to anyone but wishful thinkers.
If the past two years are really past, what's better now than in the past two years? I seem to recall a lot of promises then too. The past is prologue to the future. Performance builds on past performance. We know what the past performance has been. I see nothing to convince me the future performance will be any better than the past.
To me, believing in these people's projections is nothing but wishful thinking. They don't seem to be able to deliver.
lookup...Only the fact that it hasn't produced ANY positive results, after more than 2 years of hype and 'any time now' promises.
LLoyd...it doesn't have to be a ruse for us to have been had. A great idea with good technology that can't be implemented for some legitimate reason, or that never gets fully implemented due to incompetent management, or bungling and infighting at the NHS level, there are many legitimate reasons.
But some really convincing stock scams do often happen.
"...no real justification"...are you serious? Surely not.
Clancy, I didn't say I sold. I said those who did sell had a good idea (since the s/p is a lot lower now and they at least haven't lost more money as the s/p fell lower, and they could even buy back lower now, but I wouldn't advise it).
But I haven't sold, and won't unless it's much higher. It's too late now. I'm here to the bitter end. I either make a bundle or lose my investment.
But I think we've been had.
it was a good idea to exit.
All but number 2. 2 is wrong.
LLoyd is just expressing what a lot of us think: we've been optimistic to the point of being patsies. We're still hopeful for good things from MDFY because we have so much money tied up in a losing position and because we bought the story, but we've stopped being silly in our beliefs. There's a time when rationality has to take over from starry-eyed belief and we have to realize that it looks like we've been had.
So get off LLoyd's back and continue your own close-minded gullibility if you want but allow others their realistic view.
No way it's certain yet, but it sure looks like we've been had.
we bin had.